Featured Ancient ... but not a coin! Artifacts thread! Post 'em!

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by lordmarcovan, Dec 25, 2017.

  1. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    It says “Bronze Age”, which is very pre-Columbian. But not really an adjective one would associate with an artifact from the Americas, where the “Pre-Columbian” characterization would be more in context?

    I am accustomed to hearing “Bronze Age” more in a European or Mediterranean context.

    (Correct me if I’m wrong)
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I suppose it should pointed out that technically, fossils aren’t artifacts, since “artifact” = man made.

    That’s OK, though. I like fossils, and enjoy finding them, as I myself posted earlier in this thread. Cool stuff.
     
    DonnaML and +VGO.DVCKS like this.
  4. TheNickelGuy

    TheNickelGuy Well-Known Member

    jar2sm.jpg
    That is funny.
    Thank you, it seems to be old. The COA just came with it and I have kept it in the jar ever since. I thought it looked more Native American, like from the New Mexico area but I know absolutely nothing about this stuff.

    I do have a good memory and at the time while wanting an affordable example of old pottery, I found this. I think I paid about $75 at the time.
    I had a search of "Pre Columbian" in antiquities on eBay and looked at those things listed. I'm sure it was in that catagory.

    (My memory may be OK but the COA says 2002 so I guess I bought it in the early 2000's huh? and not late 80's early 90's)

    Thank you for chiming in Bob L and everyone else who took the time to read this and comment. I just don't want to look like a dummy and find out it is junk.
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2021
    PlanoSteve, DonnaML and +VGO.DVCKS like this.
  5. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I could be a dummy (wouldn’t be the first time), but it doesn’t look like junk to me.
     
    +VGO.DVCKS and Ryro like this.
  6. Ryro

    Ryro Trying to remove supporter status

    I was going to type the very same thing but didn't want to come off naive:muted:. Thanks for being brave:happy:
    I would then lean towards it being from the Indus Valley. But am not well steeped in ancient ceramics. I only have a handful.
     
  7. Bob L.

    Bob L. Well-Known Member

    Carinated jars of this form - or similar - with buff surfaces and dark brown painted decoration, even sometimes including wavy lines and simplified animal forms, were produced in ancient Iran of the second millennium BC as well. That's why I posed the question.
     
    DonnaML, lordmarcovan and +VGO.DVCKS like this.
  8. TheNickelGuy

    TheNickelGuy Well-Known Member

    I've learned what "Carinated" means < >
    I have seen similar paint and wavy lines and simplified animal forms on pottery from the Persia / Iran doing searches. The clay looks the same, the brown paint as well.
    I think you are correct Bob L.
    There are different periods it seems to me but now I feel more confident this is old from ancient Iran. Probably 4000 plus years old. Amazing.
     
    lordmarcovan and +VGO.DVCKS like this.
  9. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    +VGO.DVCKS likes this.
  10. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Lol. Sweet
     
    +VGO.DVCKS likes this.
  11. happy_collector

    happy_collector Well-Known Member

    Some of my bronze arrowheads collection.
    Rediscovered recently during house cleanup. :)
    =DSC04888.jpg
     
    singig, Johndakerftw, DonnaML and 4 others like this.
  12. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Someone gave you a pointer on where to find them? Drew some arrows to direct you to where you’d left them? :p

    I’ll see myself out, now.
     
  13. +VGO.DVCKS

    +VGO.DVCKS Well-Known Member

    Here's how a Victorian novelist might put it: 'quiet chuckling ensued.'
     
    lordmarcovan and happy_collector like this.
  14. GinoLR

    GinoLR Well-Known Member

    In my house cleanups we only discover old Lego blocks.
     
  15. JGGonzalez

    JGGonzalez Well-Known Member

    I just added a new piece to my collection. It's another Roman silver ring. I bought it from Akropolis Coins. Peter estimated the date range as 200 B.C. to 200 A.D. It's pretty massive and is about a US size 8.5. The silver has crystalized, but still seems solid. It's a nice little ring.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2021
  16. GinoLR

    GinoLR Well-Known Member

    If it is authentic, its shape is more like 3rd c. AD IMO.
     
  17. JGGonzalez

    JGGonzalez Well-Known Member

    Yup, that's what I estimated when I looked it up. Henig Type VIII, right?
     
  18. JGGonzalez

    JGGonzalez Well-Known Member

  19. GinoLR

    GinoLR Well-Known Member

    I am not a specialist of Roman finger rings, and I don't have any book with the typology by Henig. Do you have one?
    I just know a gold ring with the same general shape as your silver one, and this gold ring is well dated mid-3rd c. AD. It has been found in a mid-3rd C. archaeological layer.
    BTW best wishes for the new year !
     
  20. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    Here are an ancient terracotta jug and a silver bracelet. I have no idea about their nationalities. Just for fun of watching or comments.

    JugSide Roman.JPG SilvBrac.JPG
     
  21. +VGO.DVCKS

    +VGO.DVCKS Well-Known Member

    My first guess for the bracelet would have to be Celtic. ...The jug is just, Cool.
     
    paschka and 7Calbrey like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page