Neat die break error on a 1959 Frankie

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by toyz4geo, Feb 12, 2010.

  1. toyz4geo

    toyz4geo Member

    Hi All,
    I was looking over some of my mint sets in gov't packaging and found this neat 1959-P. 1st, it is a type 2 or proof type reverse as noted in the 1st picture. As I was examining it, I found that there is a die break between the I and the B of PLURIBUS in the motto, making it PLURIIBUS. Nothing
    major, but a neat error in a gov't sealed mint set. I also noticed the quarter in the same set (P-mint) is a type B (also proof type) reverse.
    Just wanted to share.
    George
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. mralexanderb

    mralexanderb Coin Collector

    Besides the die break, it looks like the E PLURIBUS UNUM is doubled. It may be the lighting in your photo but I'd check it again, take more photos to post here for some more and better opinions.

    Bruce
     
  4. NotSure

    NotSure I'm sure I'm NotSure

    I thought the same thing in regard to the E.P.U. doubling, when I first looked.

    Is it more common to find both the Frankie AND the Washie with the Type B reverses together, in the mint sets, or are they normally not found together?

    Whether it's common or not, that's a cool find, finding them both in the same set!
     
  5. jaceravone

    jaceravone Member

    That is how I found both of mine....in the mint set.
     
  6. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    not doubled, strike doubling.

    but, the die break is neat.
     
  7. toyz4geo

    toyz4geo Member

    Hi all,
    I took another look at the Frankie and did not notice any kind of doubling at all. I think it was just the light when I took the picture. I have difficulty getting the light right on a raw coin, much less when trying to shoot through the cello.....the light likes to bounce right off the cello.
    Does anyone have any idea as to the occurance of the proof reverse on these halves? Is it a fairly common variety or something I should hold on to?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page