The "T" does look interesting, bit it's awfully hard to tell what's metal and what's just crud in the pics.
Welcome to the forum. I do not think it is the 1888/7, there are a lot that has similar appearance, but the angle or shape doesn't match. @Insider may stop by to look. He is a member as well as a TPG specialist. Jim
Here are the diagnostics ( with good photos) of a higher grade, and that does make it hard to compare with a well circulated as metal can come and go. https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/1888-7-1c-bn/2169 Jim
I have no comment but now you all have an idea of what TPGS authenticators go through many times a day.
It’s definitely a head scratcher. I was definitely curious to see what you thought. TPGS surely have their work cut out for them! (Cited from: https://www.cointalk.com/threads/possible-1888-8-7-indian-head-penny.389084/page-2#post-8039364)
I feel for the graders. Do they get compensated for eye strain. I know that after playing coins since 2006 I now can’t see for shite. I submitted some coins at the ANA show and couldn’t see the form. The PCGS lady saw me struggling face planted in the form. She filled it out for me which was great. Except she checked the wrong tier which resulted in an overcharge of more than 1000$. I ended up calling and they fixed it for me.
I haven't a clue as it is so difficult to discern on your cent. I'd spend the money to send it in for authentication, so you know for sure.