GTG 1901 barber quarter

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by mrweaseluv, Oct 29, 2021.

  1. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    I'm a very happy camper this morning. Made and offer that I didn't expect to be accepted, but the dealer did :D :D :D so you get to GTG... hope the trueview is good enough for a guess :D My type set is very happy for this addition :D
    1901nocert.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    MS-60
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2021
  4. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

  5. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Collecting for 49 years Moderator

    I'm torn between AU58 and low MS.

    I'm gonna guess UNC details, cleaned.

    Nice coin for a Dansco 7070 or similar type set.
     
  6. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    AU 62. It is a slider, as I see it. The TrueView does not give much of a clue as to luster. I will seriously go with low grade MS—MS 61.
     
  7. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    I see AU-58.
     
  8. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    AU Details, cleaned
     
  9. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    don't have pic's of the label or slab (had em but it seems I have deleted them lol) same grade/issue sold in August at Stacks & Bowers for $204... (I know cause I was bidding on it lol) I got mine for less then 1/2 that and I think mine looks considerably better :D
    AU Details, cleaned.
    1901.jpg
     
  10. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    doing a "slabbed" 7070 but yeah gonna look nice in the set :D
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  11. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Collecting for 49 years Moderator

    Aha! So I wasn’t far off. I’m getting better at spotting cleaned coins. It took me years and years. This one’s not bad despite the cleaning. And I’d say it has high AU details. A nice slider, as previously noted.

    https://www.pcgs.com/cert/42802225
     
  12. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I was going to say AU 53...nice details but had a somewhat "washed out" look so the cleaned designation makes sense
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  13. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Boomshakalaka!
     
    ddddd and mrweaseluv like this.
  14. Derek2200

    Derek2200 Well-Known Member

  15. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    ok it just arrived and after a fairly careful examination... this is NOT a cleaned coin.. on close examination of the fields show 2 tiny tiny hairline scratches one on each side (most likely from being in a pocket and neither visible without a loop, they don't even show on the trueview).. I have to agree with the seller on this one.. i don't see how they called in "cleaned".. I'm gonna get some good pic's tonight with the microscope and probably a fresh post as well for them.. I honestly can't agree that this coin was ever cleaned... yeah i need the microscope to do these pic's justice.. the camera just not good enough :D 20211104_174018.jpg 20211104_174032.jpg
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2021
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page