Hey gang I picked this piece up this afternoon. I thought it was a neat looking piece. I wanted to share. Enjoy!
Matt - I gotta tell ya, I have some concerns about that coin not being genuine. Tool marks all over the place, letters not fully engraved. And it appears to be damaged to boot. For your sake I hope that either I'm wrong or you got it for a song.
I apprecieate your concerns Doug. The marks on the obverse to me appear to be planchet flaws. There are a couple of streaks of planchet flaws running on the obverse running through "G" on the obverse. The other ones appear in the obverse right field. On the reverse I saw those lines as well. I was under the impression that they were the result of a harsh die cleaning... there really isn't a rhyme or reason to them like you see with what I would consider "tool marks". They remind more of the die lines you see on early 80's Morgan silver dollars. Which we know are a result of die polishing. Personally I didn't have a problem with the marks or of course I wouldn't own it. On the other hand I am by far an expert on this particular type of coinage. Even before posting this piece I had planed on getting it certified. So if it's not genuine we'll definitely be able find out.
Send it in Matt, but I'd bet a lot I already know the outcome. And those aren't planchet flaws, that's damage.
It will be interesting to see whether Doug is correct, and that is indeed a counterfeit. It does seem rather flat, but it is not obvious to me (that it is a fake). However, IF it is made out of gold as it appears to be, it does seem odd that someone would make a fake using gold. I do know that contemporary counterfeits of spanish colonial coins were made using Platinum, which was valued much lower than gold in the spanish colonies.
Here are some pictures taken of the areas. I am again going to have to respectfully disagree with you again Doug. I see these marks as planchet flaws. They look to me to be lamination's. Directly under the period after the "D" is a piece of the planchet that has laminated but has been retained. I wish I could get a really good picture of it. There is also a planchet flaw running through the shoulder of the bust which I tried to capture... but it didn't come out as well as it does in hand. In the last picture you can also see a small retained piece of a lamination under the chin that hasn't flaked away.
If Matt thinks it is gold, then I believe it is gold. There could be a combination of a laminated planchet with planchet adjustment marks and file marks on the used die. It will be fun to see the TPG opinion.
OK, this is gonna take a while and probably several posts. But let me make my case. Please don;t anybody reply until I am finished - I will say when I am finished. First the obverse. An example of what I think is damage and why I am sure it is damage. Examine the picture below. Up near the top at the denticles, You can see where the coins has been gouged in the denticles and the metal removed from the denticles has been scraped down across the coin and left deposited where the arrows point. Next is the G - you can see a large portion of the G and the metal in the center opening of the letter has been gouged out. The gouged out metal has again been retained and deposited just below the G. You can even see the raised portion of G that is missing from the letter on the piece of metal that has been scraped down and left below the rest of the letter. Also, if you look you can see that all of these scrape/gouge marks in the denticles, the hair, the fields and the G, run in exactly the same direction. And look at the denticles themselves, every single one very poorly shaped, no consistency at all, and all of them very, very rough. I believe this is due to poor workmanship and damage.
OK, now for some tool marks on the obverse. First pic, look at the back of the hairline. See all the the little ragged pints sticking out. None of those are there on genuine coins. 2nd pic, look at the neck line, see the raised marks in front of the neck as well on the scarf. And the raised mark between the R and the ending dot. 3rd pic, look at the E. You can see where the E was first engraved, by mistake, and them moved and re-engraved in the correct position. The arrows point to the bottom, middle and top legs of the E. It's quite plain. edit - still not finished so wait before replying, please
Now for the reverse. Look at these first two pics and examine the denticles. They are all different shapes and size. And I don't mean just because of the off center strike - that would only affect the length. They are all different widths and shapes and all spaced differently. This would not be the case on a genuine coin.
Now for all the raised lines across virtually the entire reverse. I am only showing the central portion because that is where they are most visible. Now Matt, you said you thought than these were polish lines. OK, but a bit of a problem with that. At the time these were minted at the colonial mints they didn't polish the dies like they did later in the US. For one thing they didn't have the technology to do so. When they polished a used die or a rusty die they used a rag. No rag is going to cause lines like that in a die. Only an engraving tool could do that. I believe it is due to very poor workmanship and nothing else. Similar to the denticle engraving.
Now for the letters of the legends, the O's in particular. They were not fully engraved. Neither was the E. The F was first incorrectly positioned and then re-engraved in the right place. Same for the M. And the bottom leg of the Qis way too long. And there are several tool marks inside the letters of the legends. None of this would be on genuine coins. There is more, a lot more. But they are harder to see and explain. Hopefully this is enough to make my point and explain my thinking. I'm finished. But send it in anyway Matt, hopefully I'm wrong.
Doug, Thank you for the very informative post. I am very positive that your experience vastly outweighs mine on this subject. Here are a few observations on my part (that could be justified or just completely wrong) and please feel free to correct me as this is a learning experience for everyone including myself. #1 From my experience with flawed planchets, they do always seem to have a grain to them and seem to run the same way. IE woody cents. These are the most familiar improperly mixed planchets. They seem to have a grain similar to wood hence the name woody. I quote you here. You can see in my earlier post that I have said a couple of times that "I wish I could get a better picture because in hand these are definitely planchet flaws". The piece under the chin with the retained part of the planchet... I did not see this addressed in your assessment of the coin. In my book this is unequivocally a planchet flaw and also what I am seeing over the rest of the coin. The coin was struck normally and then the impurities in the planchet caused pieces of the planchet to break away later. There is no displaced metal around the edges of these marks to be consistent with gouges or scratches. I learned long ago how to tell the difference between a scratch and/or gouge and a planchet flaw. I think that my photography is lacking in this case. #2 The recut "E". This coin is 1818 and every piece of this die including the denticles was cut by hand. From your study of American coinage of the time you know that recutting of letters and numerals was common place and some were even more dramatic then what is seen here. IE the 1796 "Liherty" error and others. I think that we have to keep in mind that this piece was (supposedly) struck in Popayan Columbia. This is far from the major mints (and die cutting talent) of Lima Preu, Mexico City or even Bogota. The "P FM" mintmark only struck 8 escudos from 1816-1820 before it was changed and never used again. It was used on 1 and 2 escudos for even less time. I have to surmise that this was due to the poor work being put out by the die cutter. I know your going to say that's grabbing at straws... but this is my opinion. I have this piece packed up to be sent to NGC this afternoon. I for one hope that this is a VERY rare occasion where you are mistaken Doug. Either way I'm sure this is going to be a learning experience for everyone.
Matt I agree completely that there are planchet flaws on the coin. But where I am talking about as pointed out below - are not planchet flaws. As to the dies, the dies for every Spanish colonial mint there ever was were all made in Spain and shipped to the colonial mints - every single one. And the engravers in Spain would not make these mistakes. Look at some genuine coins, none of what you see on this coin of yours is ever on any of them.
No matter what the outcome Matt those photos are spectacular. Are you still using the Canon 50D that you bought last year? Incredible details. Good lighting too. It will be interesting to see what NGC says. Personally you both made excellent points, and I'm split here. Doug probably has more experience with World gold, while Matt handles more coins on a daily basis. Let the games begin, and may the best man win!
I wish I still had all the 8 and 4 Escudos I sold on eBay back three years ago. I sold no telling how many. Dang!
Yes that was with the Cannon. I guess I am camera spoiled because those pictures don't really show the coin how I'd like to. I shoot pictures of coins every day and I just couldn't get them to turn out how I wanted.
I know what you mean. Some coins seem to photograph themselves while others try their best to resist the process altogether. I normally have no problem with older silver and copper coins but gold coins have never been easy.
I agree with hiho, and in no way am I an expert, but I have viewed/studied a lot of 8 escudos lately (possible addition to my collection), and whereas I definitely see planchet flaws and I think some of that on the reverse may be die polish, I also see what is in my opinion damage. Good luck with the grading, it will definitely be a learning experience for me so I can't wait for the results. :thumb: Whatever the outcome .... all I can say (with no disrespect Matt) I hope you bought that coin for a basement price .... it's got way to many problems for my money !! PS .... great photos of a hard subject to properly image!! PS2 .... I hope my Saints beat your Colts:eat: