Any experts on the Rhode Island Ship token of 1779? Real or fake?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Traders101, Oct 30, 2021.

  1. Traders101

    Traders101 New Member

    Been digging on this one for awhile, but have never found any info stating correct weight or many real/fake pictures to compare to. This coin weighs 12.6g. I have found one stated to be fake and the wear pattern matches pretty well. Couldn't get much better pics. Any help is much appreciated! DSC07153.JPG DSC07154.JPG DSC07155.JPG DSC07156.JPG DSC07157.JPG DSC07158.JPG
     
    MIGuy and spirityoda like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    MIGuy likes this.
  4. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

  5. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

  6. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

  7. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    I think you should have it checked out at a coin show to find out if it real or not.
     
  8. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    What for the token experts in here.
     
  9. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    MIGuy likes this.
  10. Traders101

    Traders101 New Member

    I took it in with a big bunch of coins, i've checked out alot of the listings and researched it quite a bit online, but no one ever has the weight of the real ones. There were 4 different variations, some pewter some brass. Some with wreaths some without. I think the wreath came on the later ones to cover up a mistake they had made under the british ship, depicting it to be fleeing the battle. From what I found they were a British propaganda token, to get the Netherlands to join their cause. Not sure what to do with this, if fake its probably not worth 3 dollars but if real it could be out of this world. I did find one in my research that was stated as fake and the wear on the coin was eerily similar to this one.
     
    MIGuy likes this.
  11. l.cutler

    l.cutler Member

    Certainly no expert on the token, but comparing it to genuine examples there are differences in the alignment of the devices with the legends. It is definitely noticeable by looking at where in the legends the ship masts point. Also on the side with the date, look at how the lowest boat on the right aligns with AUG in the date, totally different. That alone is a red flag, but it also has the appearance of being cast rather than struck.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2021
    spirityoda likes this.
  12. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    I don't know anything about these token but working from Bowers' book on Colonial coinage:

    The branches under the ship indicate this would be either W-1740 (Breen-11141), struck in brass, URS-9 or the much rarer W-1745 (Breen-1142), struck in pewter, URS-5.

    Diameter should be 32 mm, plain edge. No weight provided.

    Your coin looks a little crude to me so I would have this authenticated by whatever means you think appropriate.
     
  13. Traders101

    Traders101 New Member

    That is what I was thinking too, but I also now see what l.cutler mentioned above about the date, must of missed that in my earlier searches. Strange there isn't a single listing or detail about the weight of these. The history behind the token is pretty interesting in my mind. Maybe someone that has a real one will chime in with a weight for them. I think this one is brass, there is a reddish hue coming through the tarnish.
     
  14. Traders101

    Traders101 New Member

  15. Traders101

    Traders101 New Member

    But that one is also stamped "copy", the wear is just so similar it seems too unlikely in my mind.
     
  16. l.cutler

    l.cutler Member

    Remember, on most of these, copy is stamped after the coin is struck. It also seems to often "forgotten " to be stamped on many.
     
  17. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    I've been looking for one for a long time now.. to be honest that one is extremly fine... too fine in my book not to sell for thousands... so be very very careful... this is not a cheap or easy coin/token to come by
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  18. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    I know nothing about these,but if I were a betting man I say cast copies. Looking at the surfaces it looks cast not made in a press. The surfaces ,lettering all looks off. Puter is a cheap medal ,and it doesn't take real high heat like copper,or bronze does. I be very surprised if it was legitimate.
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  19. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Hey, @Traders101 can you take some more strait on photos, the angles can be difficult to read.
    This is a rare token, the fact that yours hasn't been stamped with copy? Doesn't mean a thing, Keep up your research, I will have time tomorrow to help if you are still looking for answers.

    Neat token. And one rarely seen.
     
  20. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    There is just an overall mushiness to the details that make me suspect a counterfeit. Some of the pits on the surface have the look of casting defects. Can't be absolutely certain from the photos, of course.
     
  21. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    There is definitely some weakness going on. I not sure which way to lean on this one. I think that sending it for attribution would be helpful.
     
    spirityoda likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page