This is fake as sin... denticles are atrocious, plachet is too regular, overall design not a real match, patina looks dodgy for what is normally seen on this type. Compare to the NGC (Krause) pics here... and this is an exceptional example. https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide...t-km-64.1-1673-1678-cuid-1083334-duid-1428981
The seller is standing behind the coin <html> Well then I can tell you that this consensus was made by people without knowledge of this kind +of coins. The authenticity of this coin is unquestioned and beyond any doubt. Your suspicions +are based on nothing..... <br> <br> Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen <br> Gijs Henzen <br> Munthandel G.Henzen <p> <b>Item:</b> <A HREF="https://www.ma-shops.com/henzen/item.php?id=54298&lang=en">Zilveren dukaat +NOORDELIJKE NEDERLANDEN (NETHERLANDS) - REPUBLIEK, 1581-1795 - WEST-FRIESLAND - 167</A><br> <b>Price:</b> <span class='price'>750,00 EUR</span><br> <b>Client question</b>: according to a concensus on cointalk, this coin seems to be a fake.<br> <b>E-mail:</b> <a href='mailto:bear@mrbrklyn.com'>bear@mrbrklyn.com</a><br> </p> <br>
What puzzles me is that this guy seems to have legit coins. Just this one seems problematic. Does that make sense? https://www.ma-shops.com/henzen/search.php
Here is another example - you can see the difference in the design https://auctions.stacksbowers.com/l...nd-silver-ducat-1676-pcgs-au-50-secure-holder The original image from the vender, that coin has a 'dot' after the 'O', among other issues.