GTG: Lib Seated Half Dime

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Vess1, Aug 21, 2021.

?

What will NGC grade this?

  1. MS65

  2. MS64

  3. MS63

  4. MS62

  5. MS61

  6. MS60

  7. AU58

  8. AU Details

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Vess1

    Vess1 CT SP VIP Supporter

    thumbnail_1872-S half dime combined.jpg

    1872-S below bow

    Mintage: 837,000

    NGC Pop: 820
    NGC Details Pop: 74
    PCGS Pop: 1,060

    Here is a really neat half dime I sent in to be graded for my registry set. I have not had good luck sending dimes. (And no, what looks like original toning doesn't automatically save you.) From what I can tell this one does have luster that rolls through the toning on both sides. The details are fantastic. This is part of the reason why I love the US type set. It makes you look at other areas you wouldn't normally pay attention to. This one comes in two varieties. S below the bow or above the bow. No particular reason given as to why they did this, but PCGS claims the S below is roughly 3.5x more common than above the bow versions. Less than 2k graded. Hard telling how many of these are still in existence in any condition.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    I'll say 61 nice coin and toning.
     
  4. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  5. Mac McDonald

    Mac McDonald Well-Known Member

    AU details, but harder to see with toning in photos.
     
    Mr.Q and yakpoo like this.
  6. Vess1

    Vess1 CT SP VIP Supporter

    Yep that’s the default. Starting to think you work for NGC. Lol
     
    yakpoo likes this.
  7. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I'm going MS 62 here too...looks nice but I also see an outside shot of details cleaned (cleaned then retoned)
     
  8. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    It's a beautiful coin! I think I detect some rubs on the high points. It's hard to zoom in with any detail and the toning hides a lot. I'm going to guess AU58 CAC.
     
  9. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

  10. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

  11. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    AU details or AU55 net grade on a lucky day
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2021
    Cheech9712 likes this.
  12. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  13. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    with the small image and all the toning it's hard for me to say, without seeing it in hand.
    my guess 62
     
  14. Seascape

    Seascape U.S. & World Collector

    55
    Details
     
    Cheech9712 likes this.
  15. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I don't see why it wouldn't grade. It's kind of hard to see due to the heaviness of the toning. I went with AU58 to be conservative, but MS62 would not surprise me.
     
    Revello likes this.
  16. Revello

    Revello Well-Known Member

    Wish I could expand the photos to see more details. I think the toning will help you on the grading, for sure. I agree with lordmarcovan (AU 58, but MS 62 would be no surprise).
     
  17. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Too hard to see much with those photos, so won't even attempt it. Hope the outcome is as good, or better, than you hope.
     
  18. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    I downloaded the photos so I could blow them up to try to see the coin better, but the photos are poorly lit and out of focus. Nevertheless, I am giving the coin the benefit of the doubt and saying that it will straight-grade at 63. I can't see any rub from these photos and I just don't see the toning as anything but original. Again, I am giving the coin the BOD due to poor photos.

    But I do like the look of the thing!
     
    Revello likes this.
  19. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I did the same. Can't see any rub.
     
  20. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    62-63, then, I guess.
     
  21. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    AU-58, perhaps low MS. Good luck
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page