What are your oponions on this 1836 Half

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Bonedigger, Oct 11, 2005.

  1. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member

    What are your opinions on this 1836 Half

    Don't worry, I can take it ;)

    Bone

    edited for spelling and to add "I'm pretty sure it's been cleaned at some point." Alas. :(
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Lowell

    Lowell Junior Member

    That is a beautiful half. Much better than the one in my collection. These are getting harder and harder to find. I'd call it a keeper.
     
  4. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    if you dont want it -- look me up :D

    beautifull coin!!!
     
  5. rick

    rick Coin Collector

    very nice, I would say upper end VF, but it's difficult to say from the picture. Might be EF in hand.

    clasp appears clear. some flatness in the hair, but overall looks nice to me. Good detail in the stars. Feathers on the reverse look good, with a little rub. The claw has some wear. Again that might be the picture not the coin.
     
  6. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

    I'll go with XF maybe a low AU

    Speedy
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I gotta go with VF30.
     
  8. samjimmy

    samjimmy New Member

    Sweet! I actually just picked this up today!
     

    Attached Files:

  9. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

    Now that is a nice one....I would have to say a NICE XF....not much wear but the dark color takes it down for me....is there any chance that it has been cleaned...the edge and around the stars are darker than the rest....I would think that would point to cleaning but am not sure.

    Speedy
     
  10. rick

    rick Coin Collector

    That's a tough one. I want to say XF, too, but others might argue that the rub on the cheek and nose, plus the wear on the hair above the eyes makes it VF.

    If you ask me, the toning makes this piece more desirable. To me, that's eye appeal.

    beautiful coin.
     
  11. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member

    I agree, VF35 or so. Beautiful coin, love the color.

    Bone
     
  12. samjimmy

    samjimmy New Member

    You know, I was told it was uncleaned, but to me that picture makes it look like it has been cleaned (as you said, "the edge and around the stars are darker than the rest"). Oddly though, it looks much better than the picture and the stars and the open areas look much more evenly shaded and natural, and there isn't as much difference in the coloring. I'll try to take a picture that "looks" more accurate.

    I don't mind cleaned coins (boo me now), and even sometimes prefer them (really boo me now), but I have to say I really like the natural-ness of this one. Instantly one of my favorites.

    I'd probably like Bonedigger's example as much though, even if it was cleaned.

    :: joins the Bonedigger club ::
     
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Many times a pic will show you, or perhaps I should say allow you to see things you missed with the naked eye or a loupe. Other times pics can make things appear to be there that are not. But when you have the coin in hand to compare with the pic - you can determine what the case may be.

    Also - while darker areas around the devices and protected areas may be a sign of cleaning, it is by no means definitive in and of itself. It is only an indication that should cause you to examine the coin closer and see if there other signs as well.

    If there are no other signs of cleaning, then odds are the coin has not been cleaned. For it is natural for a coin to tone more darkly in those same areas.
     
  14. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

    So I've been passing up good coins???... :) ;)
    Oh well...I learned something new already today!!!

    Speedy
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page