Is there any way to submit a coin to RIC online?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Harry G, Aug 6, 2021.

  1. Harry G

    Harry G Well-Known Member

    Hi all! I was just wondering if it were possible to submit a new coin type to RIC online (OCRE), so that it can be included in future editions. There is a button "Contributors" at the top of the page, but it doesn't do anything when I click it.

    I've also tried submitting a new specimen on ric.mom.fr, but have had no luck there either.

    Does anyone know how to do this?

    Thanks!
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2021
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Who is RIC?
     
    yakpoo likes this.
  4. DonnaML

    DonnaML Well-Known Member

    Just curious: are you an ancient coin collector?
     
    ultprice and Evan Saltis like this.
  5. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    Broucheion and yakpoo like this.
  6. Harry G

    Harry G Well-Known Member

    Ah, sorry for my poor wording. I've tried to submit a new coin type on RIC, but a new coin example (of an existing type where there is only 1 available) on ric.mom (so the bottom right button on the screen e.g. here)
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2021
    yakpoo likes this.
  7. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    DonnaML and Ed Snible like this.
  8. Evan Saltis

    Evan Saltis OWNER - EBS Numis LLC

    It seems not, lol.
    Not Ric Flair but Roman Imperial Coins. :woot:
     
    Mr.Q, DonnaML and yakpoo like this.
  9. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    OK so clicking on that brings up the following and that does not work?
    https://ric.mom.fr/en/feedback/coinspecimen?idType=855
     
  10. Harry G

    Harry G Well-Known Member

  11. DonnaML

    DonnaML Well-Known Member

    More seriously, the one drawback I see to OCRE is that its coverage appears to be limited to the published volumes of RIC, regardless of how many new types have been discovered since those volumes were published -- some of them a very long time ago. After all, how many new Probus types have turned up since the relevant volume was published: hundreds? This drawback makes the "Online Coins of the Roman Empire" name a bit misleading. MER-RIC is obviously a great resource, but it's very limited itself in terms of its time-period, and has to be supplemented piecemeal with various resources like the Probus websites and others.
     
    ultprice, Mr.Q and David Atherton like this.
  12. David Atherton

    David Atherton Flavian Fanatic

    OCRE is not RIC. However, it does utilize RIC's numbering system.
     
    Orfew likes this.
  13. DonnaML

    DonnaML Well-Known Member

    The text and format and photos are very different, but it's supposed to encompass the coins listed in RIC, and it's arranged by RIC numbers.
     
  14. PeteB

    PeteB Well-Known Member

    What is the usual time lapse between submission and the change appearing? Is there a review of the submission before adoption?
    I ask because, I too, submitted changes and a picture of a Tacitus coin two weeks ago or so and the changes and picture still have not appeared.
     
  15. David Atherton

    David Atherton Flavian Fanatic

    True, but it isn't RIC, which is published by Spink. OCRE is an ANS project.
     
    Mr.Q and Ed Snible like this.
  16. DonnaML

    DonnaML Well-Known Member

    That leads me back to my earlier comment: why did the ANS limit OCRE's coverage to the coins listed in RIC, and make no attempt whatsoever to include any of the great many coin types discovered since the RIC volumes were published?
     
    Mr.Q likes this.
  17. red_spork

    red_spork Triumvir monetalis

    I'm not involved with OCRE or CRRO but as an outsider who has looked into the tech used a bit and knows a few of the people working on these databases, I can provide at least a partial answer. First and foremost, these projects are based on specific reference works, not just for organization, but also because the way that OCRE or CRRO show you all the coins for a given type in the BnF, BM, ANS, etc is through the use of linked IDs, so if you want to look at RRC 287/1 then all those institutions must catalog their examples as "RRC 287/1" for them all to show up on the page. So types in the publication are relatively "easy"(though still a lot of work), but it takes a lot more coordination to add the necessary data for the system to reflect coin types not included in whatever the main publication is that is used for that database and have the examples actually appear from other museums.

    It would not surprise me if, at some point, an effort is made to add some of the many types published or rehabilitated since the publication of these various works, but I know at the moment a lot of their resources are tied up on other projects such as further integration of RRDP into CRRO.
     
    DonnaML likes this.
  18. Severus Alexander

    Severus Alexander find me at NumisForums

    The ric.mom.fr site seems to be on an indefinite hiatus... no changes have been uploaded in many months. :(
     
    Roman Collector likes this.
  19. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    nope
     
    Mr.Q likes this.
  20. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    Projects like OCRE are huge undertakings even in the best of times and these last two years most certainly have not been the best. I do not know the particulars on this but I would not expect a two week turn around under normal circumstances. Do I wish there were an OCRE type project covering the coins of greatest interest to me? You bet! Am I willing to devote the rest of my life to making that happen. Nope. I appreciate what we have and the fact that they posted it as a work in progress rather than piling it up in a corner awaiting publication of a hard cover book. You say they are using RIC organization? Maybe but the number to use when referencing it is called 'Temp'. Will the project ever reach completion? Probably not in the lifetimes of the current workers. I'm not sure any worthwhile project ever reaches completion. There is a major difference between 'where we stopped' and 'where there was no more to be learned'.
     
    ultprice and DonnaML like this.
  21. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Enjoyed the story line. Great knowledgeable answers Donna, thanks for the lesson!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page