Just got this early commemorative

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by sturmgrenadier, Jan 3, 2010.

  1. sturmgrenadier

    sturmgrenadier Junior Member

    What do you think? It has brighter/more luster than these pictures show. Any tips on how to capture more of a coin's luster? I'm guessing it is a real art that must be practiced, practiced, and practiced more:)

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Breakdown

    Breakdown Member

    Photos are a little blurry to see too much (but hey, you already take better photos than I do). There will be plenty of people on here with photography advice, but I love the Connecticut commem -- it's a great design. What's the grade?
     
  4. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    It would be a lot more convenient if you could rotate the pics and put them right side up.

    It looks like you've captured a good bit of the luster, at least on the reverse anyways. The best thing I can tell you about that is trial and error are your friends. I use three lights, and just move them around until I get the look I want. As I've become more and more familiar with different series, I generally have a pretty good idea where the lights should be for that coin.

    Your problem is focus. Are you shooting handheld? Try getting a tripod - a cheap one at walmart or best buy shouldn't be any more than $10.
     
  5. sturmgrenadier

    sturmgrenadier Junior Member

    Yeah, I really stink at taking pictures:( I suspect my tremoring hands are the problem. I really need to get a tripod or try shooting with the camera firmly on a table and with the coin rigged upright (like some posters have suggested). It's MS-66. My dealer tried to sticker it before he sold it to me but it didn't earn one. I know the sticker is just another grading opinion, though.
     
  6. louielot

    louielot Junior Member

    If it is a MS 66 I would love to see some better pics.
     
  7. sturmgrenadier

    sturmgrenadier Junior Member

    Louielot,
    I justly feel like I have egg on my face, but when I went to try taking better pics including the label, I was shocked to realize that I erred in calling my Connecticut an MS-66 when it is in fact only a regular MS-65:( This will sound like the lamest excuse, but I must have confused it with two other early commemoratives that I recently bought (a Lynchburg and a Columbia, SC) which both actually are graded MS-66. I am sorry for piquing your interest when it was not warranted.

    Richard
     
  8. louielot

    louielot Junior Member

    No problem, I would still love to see it.
     
  9. sturmgrenadier

    sturmgrenadier Junior Member

    Thanks, Louielot. I think these are a little better. I took them with the camera resting on a flat surface.


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  10. sturmgrenadier

    sturmgrenadier Junior Member

    Rats, the HTML tags didn't take. Hopefully the pics will post this time...

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Niko

    Niko Junior Member

    This appears to be plastic. In Germany we do not buy plastic unless i notgeld. I am afraid that all Amerikan coins are molded in gold silver unt copper since this is plastic it can't be a coin :)
     
  12. sturmgrenadier

    sturmgrenadier Junior Member

  13. sturmgrenadier

    sturmgrenadier Junior Member

    'This appears to be plastic. In Germany we do not buy plastic unless i notgeld. I am afraid that all Amerikan coins are molded in gold silver unt copper since this is plastic it can't be a coin :)'

    Wenn Sie Ihre Sammlung verkaufen mussen, finden Sie leider vielleicht heraus, daS sie wertlos ist:( Manchmal ist Plastik gut:)

     
  14. Niko

    Niko Junior Member

    Nein, mein Sammlung ist Münzen. :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page