I almost went with MS67 but thought there were too many marks on the neck. I don't think it would get the PL designation.
I think it's a solid MS67...but I accidently put 66 on the poll. I'm at 67. It's very clean with minimal nicks and booming luster.
I almost went 65 due to the marks on the eagle/shield on the reverse, and I'm guessing the marks on the portrait on the obverse (as well as the couple I see in the fields) are not quite so visible in hand. So I ventured a guess at 66. Fun side note, I only have about 125 of these haha (not many in this condition, though, haha, but a really nice toned example I'll eventually send in.) Thank you for sharing.
The few marks are not in prime focal area and is a well struck example. As with all photo GTG you don't get the whole visual experience, but I think it got prooflike designation. MS67 PL
The obverse contact marks, along with the tired die and soft strike, makes me think MS64. If I'm wrong, I blame the photographer.
Yes it is. I have several, some still in the original Mint Set with the original Government packaging.
We have a dozen or so. And get this, all from searching boxes. We even have quite a few of the later date 90% silvers. One wouldn't think any of these would find their way to circulation, but quite a lot evidently do.
I have found a few clashed Kennedy half’s now. I was not planning on collecting Kennedy’s ever but may rethink that . I like the Rhino clashed coins . Just picked up another one. This one a 1988 . Will be neat to see how many separate years I can find