I'll say 63 and its a beautiful 65 gem today but they do get it right sometimes back then.Nice coin really like those cracks and is that a possible strike through in front of the head.
Definitely high end, my first thought was MS 66, but maybe that hit in front of her forehead keeps it back to MS-65.
MS 64....nice luster (not seeing evidence to suggest PL from the images)...a few minor scrapes on the cheek, along with a bigger hit below the P of "Pluribus" keep it out of a 65 in my opinion. It is also a better date but at the same time a CC, so I'm not sure if it got the CC bump or was more conservatively judged based on it being a better date. I've excluded this from my grade guess (just generally mentioning it).
Beautiful coin. Nice die cracks and what looks to be clashed on the reverse. Probably got a CC bump, so I am at MS65 PL. Overall, a wonderful example.
You take away that gash off the forehead and it's right there in gem or real close to it. I think they gave it MS63 on the theory their market isn't going to like that gash that much.
Really nice piece. Has some scuffs but on the obverse that I think limits the grade but none look like serious hits. I think that puts it at an MS65.
I'm going with 65 just because the CC Morgans tend to be baggy and seem to get graded a notch higher than some of the other dates/ mm in the series.