Some grade opinions....

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by bigjpst, Dec 24, 2009.

  1. bigjpst

    bigjpst Well-Known Member

    Just got this 1940 S Jefferson nickel for my dads birthyear set and since I am new to grading and am trying to learn I was hoping for some opinions...I was leaning to MS 60 or 61, but could be as low as AU...either way it isn't as nice as was advertised so it won't be going in the set..
    [​IMG]
    IMG]http://i937.photobucket.com/albums/ad217/bigjpst/1940snickel.jpg[/IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Gotta go with AU. Too much luster missing.
     
  4. borgovan

    borgovan Supporter**

    I'm also saying AU.

    Fortunately for you, since it's a birth year set you're after, mint state nickels from 1940 are very easy to obtain, and very inexpensive. You should have no problem finding an example for a dollar or so.
     
  5. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

  6. HULL COINS

    HULL COINS Member

    I thought 63 was a MS grade not a AU
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    It is, but when the numbers 63 and 64 are used in conjuction with the preffix AU (AU63) - it is to describe a coin that is often otherwise referred to as a slider. Meaning that the coin is very nice for the AU grade and that many people, if they were not experienced enough to note the light wear, would assign, mistakenly or misleadingly so, the MS grade to the coin.
     
  8. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    I'll agree with the AU grade. Are you looking for strictly a MS Coin raw?
     
  9. bigjpst

    bigjpst Well-Known Member

    Yes I am looking for as nice a set as I can afford raw...It's funny when I decided to do the set I looked through my accumulated coins and found I had all but the quarter in lower grades, but my intention is to have P-D-and S mintmarks Raw as nice as I can afford and San Francisco set certified PCGS as nice as I can afford, I got a new camera today so I plan on posting pics of my certified coins,(my other cam could not get nice enough pics)
    P.S thanks again Borgovan
     
  10. bigjpst

    bigjpst Well-Known Member

    here is my 1940-S pcgs ms-65 fs.
    [​IMG]
    ps. the scratches are on the slab[​IMG]
     
  11. bigjpst

    bigjpst Well-Known Member

    here is the pcgs 1940-S ms-66 rd
    gonna take me a while to get the pics with the new camera,,,,,
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  12. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    That is a very nice Jefferson Nickel. That would cross easily into an NGC MS66 5FS holder as long as the steps are defined. Hard to tell from your photo if the 5 full steps are there. I love it.
     
  13. bigjpst

    bigjpst Well-Known Member

    Thanks that means alot coming from you Lehigh...I respect your opinion
    unfortunately it looks like the bottom step has a little disturbance....but overall I was very happy when I bought this one....
     
  14. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I assume you are talking about the bridge under the third column between the 5th & 6th step. That is not consequential as it only precludes the 6FS designation. The area that concerns me is under the 4th pillar between the 3rd & 4th steps. If that area is not bridged and the photo is playing tricks on me, then the coin will almost certainly cross into an NGC MS66 5FS holder.

    PCGS price guide lists this coin @ $60 but my guess is you paid between $30-$40 for it. If it were to cross to an NGC MS66 5FS, it would almost certainly sell for $100-$125.
     
  15. bigjpst

    bigjpst Well-Known Member

    here is a better picture of the steps, I see what you are talking about
    [​IMG]
     
  16. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    I don't believe this would make the NGC attribution. As lehigh questioned, I see "bridging" 3-4 th steps.
     
  17. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

    nice closeup on the steps there
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page