Never disregard poor quality eBay photos...

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Harry G, May 29, 2021.

  1. Harry G

    Harry G Well-Known Member

    Hi all! Just thought I'd share a neat little purchase I made.

    I was browsing eBay, as I normally do, and came across this listing.

    ebay coins 1.jpg

    The picture leaves much to be desired, but I thought I'd click anyway, just in case a rarer coin was included.

    ebay coins 2.jpg

    The second image was much better. I wonder why they didn't put that as their first image? They would have probably attracted so many more bidders.

    I won the lot for just under £13, and this is what arrived!

    IMG_20210529_115936.jpg
    IMG_20210529_120003.jpg

    I'm super stoked with this lot, particularly that beautiful Magnentius follis

    View attachment 1310851

    The coin looks much better in hand, and is so detailed, especially his thick eyebrows

    decentius 2.png

    Share any coins that you bought that were better than pictured!


    EDIT: It looks like I misattributed the Magnentius, and I think it's actually Decentius. If anyone knows a precise attribution, I'd welcome any ideas!

    EDIT 2: Holy cow I think it's this one from Ambianum mint! https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/...0001/lot-916b86aa-a4d9-4940-afff-a43200d0e4c6
     
    Last edited: May 29, 2021
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    Wow! What a difference in hand, @Harry G! You got a great deal because the seller made his coins look unappealing. That Maxentius is a lovely example!

    Frank Robinson's photos are notoriously unflattering. Here's the photo from his auction:

    Faustina Jr VENVS FELIX denarius FSR.jpg

    And here's my photo:

    Faustina Jr VENVS FELIX denarius.jpg
     
  4. CoinJockey73

    CoinJockey73 Well-Known Member

    That guy makes me look like Mapplethorpe! Your photos are so much better.
     
  5. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    Those are great! In hand...not so much in the seller's photos :p
    I too have been perusing ebay sales with poor images. I purchased a few coins from a seller who had bad photos and descriptions and have been very pleased when the coins arrived.
     
  6. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    I'm mostly interested in early US, 1793-1857.
    Right now my concentration is on Draped Bust half cents and cents.
    And trying to ID varieties of some of those coins is almost impossible from poor photos.

    I can only remember cherrypicking one coin on eBay.
    It was an R-5 Capped Bust quarter variety.
    The images were good enough to ID the variety.

    Who knows what I've missed because of bad images.
     
    Bayern, Harry G and furryfrog02 like this.
  7. Restitutor

    Restitutor Well-Known Member

    The first photo somehow looks like it was captured via a xerox scanner which is quite impressive lol
     
    TonkawaBill and Harry G like this.
  8. coin_nut

    coin_nut Well-Known Member

    I buy a lot of old Indian coins, some 2000 years old and more. Many times they are not identified properly, so I do my homework and sometimes come up with a winner. The coin below was completely mis-identified and I got it cheap from ebay.
    950-958 Kshema Gupta & Didda Rani AE stater.

    "Parva Gupta was succeeded by his son Kshema Gupta in A.D. 950. He was a prince of low habits, and lost a portion of his dominions by foreign invasion. He married Didda, the daughter of Sinha Raja of Lahor, and died after a reign of eight years and a half. His coin was a joint issue with his wife queen Didda." Courtesy of Ancient Indian Coin Collection blogspot.com

    950-958 Kshema G & Didda R 1 p.jpg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page