1958D double

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Cazador, May 28, 2021.

Tags:
  1. Cazador

    Cazador Supporter! Supporter

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Cazador

    Cazador Supporter! Supporter

    Got a couple rolls from the Jiffy store first one to come out
     
  4. MeowtheKitty

    MeowtheKitty Well-Known Member

    Looks like MD to Meow.
     
    VistaCruiser69 and GH#75 like this.
  5. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Mechanical doubling.. not a true Doubled Die Variety
     
    VistaCruiser69 and Cazador like this.
  6. Cazador

    Cazador Supporter! Supporter

    Thanks figured I’d double check since I’m new at this
     
  7. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Before around 1990/91 the mint marks were punched into the dies, which already had the dates on them. When both the mint mark and the date are doubled that's a pretty sure sign the doubling was caused by a single event, the strike. Just keep it in mind.
     
    Inspector43, Cazador and CygnusCC like this.
  8. Cazador

    Cazador Supporter! Supporter

    That’s great information thanks I’ll keep it in mind
     
    eddiespin likes this.
  9. Cazador

    Cazador Supporter! Supporter

    If the mint mark was punched separately and it is doubled would that mean it’s rpm
     
  10. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    You got it. But remember, the diagnostics have to still be right. Take the zinc ones, for example. Those "RPMs" are plating issues, they're not real RPMs. And there could be slippage in the punch if it wasn't held steady. In an RPM, remember, you're looking for two, not one that slid or twisted a little. This is hardened steel they're punching into, so that happens. Expect they'll be adjacent and for the most part overlapping.
     
    Cazador likes this.
  11. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    The 1960-D is both a Doubled Die (Small over Large Date ) and has a WRPM and so it is the only exception I know, and should be mentioned when making the statement . Jim

    1960-Ddate.JPG
     
    Cazador and GH#75 like this.
  12. Cazador

    Cazador Supporter! Supporter

    That’s good stuff ! Thanks for sharing the knowledge
     
  13. Danomite

    Danomite What do you say uh-huh

    Are you claiming there are no RPMs for copper plated zinc cents?
     
  14. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I was unclear. Let me try it, again. Everything before 1990/91 is susceptible to RPMs, of course. The zinc mint marks are particularly susceptible to plating issues that mimic separation and RPMs.
     
    Danomite likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page