Before around 1990/91 the mint marks were punched into the dies, which already had the dates on them. When both the mint mark and the date are doubled that's a pretty sure sign the doubling was caused by a single event, the strike. Just keep it in mind.
You got it. But remember, the diagnostics have to still be right. Take the zinc ones, for example. Those "RPMs" are plating issues, they're not real RPMs. And there could be slippage in the punch if it wasn't held steady. In an RPM, remember, you're looking for two, not one that slid or twisted a little. This is hardened steel they're punching into, so that happens. Expect they'll be adjacent and for the most part overlapping.
The 1960-D is both a Doubled Die (Small over Large Date ) and has a WRPM and so it is the only exception I know, and should be mentioned when making the statement . Jim
I was unclear. Let me try it, again. Everything before 1990/91 is susceptible to RPMs, of course. The zinc mint marks are particularly susceptible to plating issues that mimic separation and RPMs.