It will be interesting hoe they handle the star weakness. Is it strike or wear? And how do they tell?
1899 P MS 65 Morgan. Low mintage semi-key, or even (arguably) key date. A nice, well struck, and lustrous blast white example. This coin should be worth a little more, imo. But an interesting date nonetheless. I’m happy w/ it.
I hope that is the case, but sometimes it's an excuse for a lower grade. Weakly struck and coins from worn dies seem to be an area of inconsistency. There's a reason there are 11 different grades of MS. But where you make those distinctions seem to be a matter of preference for the individual grader.
Picked these up yesterday, getting my weekly coin fix. I'm starting to get into circulated classic commems. Some beautiful artwork and I like that someone bought them and then for what ever reason they entered circulation. The dime was thrown in to round out the purchase price and it didn't hurt that I needed this date/mm in my date set.
Picked this up tonight. A little dark, but I think looks like original skin. I don't have much experience in this commemorative type. Luster is there a couple if spots on the reverse. I am not seeing wear, but again not experienced. Looks like a little weakness in the strike at the hair curls but no luster break or discoloration...so not sure if high AU or MS 63.
I would think it was done before they started carving nickles, though it would requrie more research. This one has "No Free Trade" at the bottom and they say that was a quote from the late 1890's. https://coins.ha.com/itm/love-tokens/1877-us-trade-potty-dollar/a/427-82122.s
I wonder where "Josh B'Gosh" comes from. It sounds like a campaign slogan. Clothing maker Oshkosh B'Gosh supposedly got its name from a tagline in a vaudeville show but that's all I could find.
I learned something interesting the other day. On the flighted planes on your 2021 Tuskegee Airmen quarters there are numbers on the wings