Strong 63, I'll go with 63+. I'm assuming it's just the pictures that make some areas around the devices look less reflective. If they actually are, it may not get the DMPL designation. Good eye appeal, no heavy hits, going 63+ DMPL. Edit: CC bump, now thinking/voting 64DMPL.
64 dmpl ....I think the photo doesn't quite show it, but the coin is dmpl (the "halo" around the Eagle I tend to see on DMPL CCs)....fields are relatively clean, cheek has some hit/minor grazes...strike is solid...good eye appeal
wow I will say MS-64 DMPL , Prooflike and DMPL show every mark. She is a beauty. I say DMPL from the reflections around Her and the eagle
64+ The halo effect had me wondering about possible PL. But the chatter on the reverse above "In God We Trust" rarely appears on PL coins and likely keeps it from reaching ms65.
Okay, the reveal. Most of the guesses were way low. I think the reason for that are that pictures of a PL or DMPL often exaggerate anything on the surface of the coin. Besides, this coin is incredibly reflective, so capturing it in pictures is difficult. What looks like typical bagmarks on a Morgan end up looking 10 times more exaggerated. Also, the die polish lines tend to look like nicks and scratches. In hand, this coin is a beast, and one of my favorites.
It got a huge jump well because its a CC yes I admit was a little to much about the marks e.t.c and without a doubt its DMPL and a nice coin to own otherwise