1966 dime no very good with dimes but the back my thoughts

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

It was the year I was born . I don't see anything wrong with it .

 

Looks like the reverse die was well worn. That's all I see.

 

Nice circulated dime, no problems or errors... keep looking

 

It held up fairly well for a 55 yr. old circulated piece. Often at that age the I of IN and the W of WE are worn down beyond being readable, as well as the last number on the mintmark.

 

You wouldn't care to translate that into something that resembles a question, would you?

 

Small anomalies but I see no errors. Keep trying, good luck

 

As mentioned before, it's die wear.
Otherwise, it's really attractive I think. Looks much nicer than most 1967s I find.

Welcome back

 

I can't begin to formulate a comment to this thread.

 

I I I think thats there best translation,translation, translation doesn't compute.

 

Am I missing the point?

 

(No very good with pennies either...!)

 

I think he's doing quite well for a person who's from Italy and doesn't speak English!

 

I wasn't making fun of his English, that'd be rude! Simply, he said he wasn't very good with dimes, and from his posts in the past with pennies, i was saying (but using his spelling error as tongue in cheek), that he hasn't been very good with the pennies either. That's all.

 

Just a dime minted the same year I graduated from High School!!!

 

If he doesn't speak English what's he doing on here? I think you're being insulting. He speaks English. He doesn't ask questions!

Here, honestly, you presumably speak English, translate this into a question: 1966 dime no very good with dimes but the back my thoughts. Take your time, I'm in no rush...

 

I was 12 at the time.

 

Ya'll are making me feel like a tiny kid lol, 1966 is 36 years before I was born!

 

It's a valuable coin.

 

I was already retired from the USAF before you were born!! LOL