What keeps this from an MS Grade

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by cplradar, Apr 4, 2021.

  1. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Kurisu

    Kurisu Well-Known Member

    Because it's definitely got some circulation wear, it's very nice though...somewhere close to AU55-58 is my guess.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  4. masterswimmer

    masterswimmer A Caretaker, can't take it with me

    The lower most star on the left.
    The second star from the top on the right.
    The entire tail feather area on the rev.

    All show wear. AU55-58 is top of the grade for it.
     
  5. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    some rub on a couple stars and on the stems/arrows/talons on the reverse.. that rub is more then enough to be called circulation and limit it to 58... Beautiful beautiful bustie though :D
     
  6. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    It isn't even the stars. Look into the open fields. See the brilliance around the devices and the dull luster. AU has more of an affect on the coin than just the highpoints.
     
    micbraun and atcarroll like this.
  7. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    Look at the eagle's head over the eye and the upper most areas on the wings.
    IMO AU-58 is a bit of an overgrade.
    I think AU-55 is closer to the truth.
     
    cplradar likes this.
  8. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum

    overpriced?
     
  9. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    I don't know.
    I have no idea of what the R-value is.
     
    cplradar likes this.
  10. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Because AU is a 58, not a MS grade.
     
  11. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    It’s correctly graded as AU58. There’s minimal wear on the OBV of the coin, e.g. left and right fields. The REV high points also show circulation wear, but it’s less obvious.

    Although the luster is good, slightly better luster can be expected of an MS coin. CAC approved this coin, because the surfaces are original (i.e. not messed with).
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2021
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  12. Long Beard

    Long Beard Well-Known Member

    Ever so slight abrasions on the high points, and the rim marks. An very nice survivor in upper AU territory.
     
    cplradar likes this.
  13. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    The coin has some very light wear on the highest points. It may not have even come from circulation. Envelope friction from jamming coins into tightly packed boxes can cause this.

    As for the grade, mine is AU-58. You guys have not seen what an AU-55 looks like these days.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page