GTG: 1934s Peace Dollar

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Mar 30, 2021.

?

Grade me

  1. AU 50

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. AU 53

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. AU 55

    4 vote(s)
    10.5%
  4. AU 58

    14 vote(s)
    36.8%
  5. MS 60

    3 vote(s)
    7.9%
  6. MS 61

    3 vote(s)
    7.9%
  7. MS 62

    6 vote(s)
    15.8%
  8. MS 63

    5 vote(s)
    13.2%
  9. Details (explain)

    3 vote(s)
    7.9%
  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    One of the biggies. Recent pickup.

    98D1244A-2E2B-4D12-B9C6-005AE5FA5608.jpeg 86197A6D-B136-439B-BFBF-1DB6934CFF35.jpeg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    58 wouldn't be surprised if its low ms.
     
    YoloBagels and Morgandude11 like this.
  4. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I don't see any wear, but the luster profile looks strange. Based on those photos, it has a washed out dipped appearance that NGC loves to grade MS62, despite having MS64 surfaces.
     
  5. YoloBagels

    YoloBagels Well-Known Member

    AU58, looks over-dipped. Could be a mix of being dipped and poor lighting/angle that gives it the AU look.
     
  6. Tater

    Tater Coin Collector

    I hate coins that look like this in photos because I don;t know if it is lighting or the coin that gives it the dull look. Hard to judge luster and wear on this one. Detail wise it could be a 64 coin like Lehigh said but I can't figure out the luster on it and if it has luster breaks it could be in a 55-58 holder. It's a key date so and they like tons of luster for the higher end grades so I could see it in a 62-63 holder, I'll assume that their is no wear with decent luster and give it a 63.
     
    Lehigh96 and Morgandude11 like this.
  7. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Nothing to hate. It has nice detail, and is attractive in hand. If it had screaming MS 64-65 luster, it would be an $8,000 coin. Yeah, it is a bit over dipped, but not to the point that would render it ugly.
     
    longshot and Penny Luster like this.
  8. Mammothtooth

    Mammothtooth Stand up Philosopher, Vodka Taster

    I like the number 61....
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  9. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    First impression was the same as @Lehigh96, but if it is just the photo and not how the coin looks in hand, I would have to have better photos before I would attempt a guess at the grade.
     
  10. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    That's a tough coin. Nice looking but I went MS-61. Very difficult to grade due to strike issues.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  11. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum

    It is hard to tell if it is MS or not, but I voted conservatively at AU53
     
  12. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    Impaired Choice uncirculated
    So I Voted MS61
     
  13. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  14. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I went with 58.
     
  15. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Definitely has luster issues from overdipping. Lighting makes it look worse than it is, but not optimum. Strike is typical for a 1934s—below average. I don’t see any obvious wear. Question is, how did the TPG treat somewhat muted luster, but decent details, especially of the devices?
     
    Tater likes this.
  16. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    I'm very interested to see what they graded this one,reveal:):).
     
  17. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    58/62 split, and I leaned to the 58 side given the date
     
  18. Bluntflame

    Bluntflame Well-Known Member

    I gotta go with 58 in this case. Luster profile looks a little funny, and I do think that a slight bit of wear may be visible on the top of the eagles shoulder. (Although, Peace dollars can sometimes have weaker strikes like any other coin. Hard to say with my lack of expertise.)
     
  19. Tater

    Tater Coin Collector

    With this I'd like to change my answer to uncirculated details improper cleaning.
     
  20. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Sorry, but no cigar. Straight graded.
     
  21. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page