Grading Morgans

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by cplradar, Mar 25, 2021.

  1. LA_Geezer

    LA_Geezer Well-Known Member

    Ditto on the not being keen on the toning; would turn me off from bidding on it pronto, so no reason for me to care about the grade.
     
    Collecting Nut likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. capthank

    capthank Well-Known Member

  4. 1865King

    1865King Well-Known Member

    I don't about it being proof like but, could be. Grading I would expect to see MS 65 on this coin. I didn't notice any big hits or scratches. Nicely struck. Not sure about color but, the lighting has an affect on that. This could could look different in hand but, still nice.
     
  5. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    MS-64. DPL is dicey with this date because some many of them are bright and nice.
     
  6. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 64 PL ....could be a 65 as the fields look relatively clean but the graders tend to be more conservative with this date
     
  7. Tamaracian

    Tamaracian 12+ Yr Member--Supporter

  8. TheTodd

    TheTodd Member

  9. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    MS65....and I don't know how any of us can say PL or DMPL since we can't do the reflection test from photos.
     
  10. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum

  11. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

    I have bought from David Kahn. Always has amazing stuff. Does he post here?
     
  12. superzimm

    superzimm Well versed collector

    Not a lot of marks, and a nice looking coin. I happen to like toning, so that's a plus.
    I'm going with ms65DMPL
     
  13. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I have seen 1881-S dollars with smoother cheeks in lower grade holders. This date is common in high grade.

    At the MS-66 level, this coin is over graded relative to how this issue has been graded in the past. There was a time when getting an MS-65 grade for an 1881-S dollar was hard.
     
    chascat likes this.
  14. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    Gack the toning...I would want a different piece for that money.
     
  15. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    It's tough taking pictures of Morgans with frosty devises. The minor lustre grazes always pop.
    I'm not shocked it didn't grade PL though.
     
  16. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum

    it is also a CAC coin
     
  17. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    So, what does that mean except for the fact that some people are ready to pay more for it because of a sticker?

    When I saw that this piece was graded MS-66, it said to me that CAC is following "grade-flation" not going against it. This not the first time that I have seen this.
     
  18. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    The grade train...grader>cac>Ed Wood>next?
     
  19. 1865King

    1865King Well-Known Member

    I can see MS 66.
     
  20. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    With the marks on the cheek?
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  21. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    I can see around 63-64 as its highest 65 as a slider ,its not over gem thats CAC;).
     
    johnmilton likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page