GTG: 1917-D Standing Liberty Quarter

Try this one. It’s in an NGC slab.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

61 no FH nice coin.

 

I would say AU-58, but I always under grade these coins. I see a rub and breaks in the mint frost on the high points of the obverse.

 

AU-58 as well

 

AU58

 

AU-56.5

 

MS-60

 

I'll join at 58 but looks much prettier very nice piece

 

MS 60. Beautiful coin.

 

Any more opinions? Reveal in an hour.

 

An hour ? Can hardly wait !

 

MS62

 

I guess I'm the lone wolf here. I see AU-55.
The eagles right wing (our left) feathers show too much wear.
Hair and face also showing too much wear.

 

The obverse photo is too cloudy. I can't even make out her toes, which should put her in EF. Assuming the best off these photos, the reverse being the better of them, AU55, why not? I love her, if that means anything, she's my kind of lady.

 

OK. Here we go. Slider?

 

Just proof that without the coin in hand it's virtually impossible to accurately grade it. Congrats. Nice grade on a good coin.

 

Wow,I would've probably guessed that in hand,doesn't look FH by the pictures.

 

It's not a full head. It's a "full face," but it's not a full head. I used to buy Standing Liberty coins like this all the time when I was a dealer. It was good for the buyer because they got a pretty sharp coin without paying the "Full Head" price, presuming that the TPG didn't call it a "Full Head."

This Type I Standing Liberty Quarter has a Full Head. Note the hair detail that is missing on the 1917-D piece.

 

^^^Yes its not a FH but it still got the designation I disagree with there results.

 

Yes, slider, if the parts on the obverse that look grey in photo are grey in person.

The TPG's do this all the time with coins that have a light rub. In one way, it's market grading because I think that the coin with a light rub and great eye appeal is just as or more desirable as a coin that is technically Mint State but unattractive or ugly.