Possible DDR ?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by jessash1976, Oct 28, 2009.

  1. jessash1976

    jessash1976 Coin knowledgeable

    This penny looks like it has doubling all through the outer devices on the reverse. "IN GOD WE TRUST", a little on "ONE CENT", and the initials. What do you guys think? I tried to post the clearest pics I could, but the U an I in "UNITED" have clear separation on the tops of the letters. JMO
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. jcuve

    jcuve Lincoln variety fanatic

    My initial reaction is mild MD. I am certain it is not a doubled die.

    It appears to be a post-'92 Lincoln - what year is it exactly?
     
  4. Big Ben

    Big Ben New Member

    I would say MD too not a doubled die
    Big Ben
     
  5. jessash1976

    jessash1976 Coin knowledgeable

    It is a 1999 Philly. I think with the separation on the I and U, it might be a DDR. I will see what others think.
     
  6. jcuve

    jcuve Lincoln variety fanatic

    I’m sorry, but what I see in these pictures is inconsistent with die doubling.

    Anyone have found the appearance of doubling on a coin must ask themselves if what appears to be separation lines fall onto the device itself or outside of it - or in other words, is the design elements the typical size with an additional area adjoined to it making it bigger, or do the separation lines cut into the design.

    The last picture posted is critical to this question - with what appears as separation lines on the E and S of STATES – the lines cut into the E & S, sharply. If I deleted the doubled areas the resulting E & S would be both smaller than normal and oddly shaped. That tells me this is machine doubling. The fact that the separation lines are sharp as opposed to rounded, tells me this machine doubling. What happened is the die came back down and slightly squashed the outside design elements (i.e., machine doubling).

    The final clue is this kind of doubling on the outside devices on single squeeze hubbings is rare; however, when it has occurred there was notching, extra thickness and (rounded) separation lines. Three examples would be 2004P DDR-001, 2006P DDO-003 and 1995D DDO-003. Examine photos of those coins and find the differences.
     
  7. Digenes

    Digenes Just a collector

    I am not sure if this will help you at all, but here are a couple of photos of a coppercoins 1983P-1DR-001, Wexleer WDDR-001 I found few months back.
    You might be able to use these photos to compare to what you found

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    Hope these images help you see what jcuve is trying to tell you.

    Dave
     
  8. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    I was not sure until I saw the CA picture (#4)
    MD.
     
  9. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    I agree MD
    But could it be what there calling a class 6???
     
  10. rockdude

    rockdude Coin Collector

    Not a class 6, MD.
     
  11. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    Then show me a class 6???
     
  12. jcuve

    jcuve Lincoln variety fanatic

    I am perplexed how the discussion has changed to class VI doubling - class VI is characterized by extra thickness, not separation lines. There is no class VI doubling shown in the above pictures - it is MD.

    Below is 2009 FY DDO-003 which is listed as class VI by Dr. Wiles of CONECA and conversely as a class IX on Coppercoins.com. Sorry the photos are not better but it is all I have at the moment.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    Thank Jason! but your 2nd photo to me looks like MD. is your 1st photo class 6?? or 2nd??
     
  14. jcuve

    jcuve Lincoln variety fanatic

    They are both the 2009 FY DDO-003 (3-O-VI) Discovery Coin. I need to re-shoot so it is clearer but I have other things to do first...

    Here are James Wiles pics, better than mine: LINK
     
  15. foundinrolls

    foundinrolls Roll Searching Enthusiast

    No Class VI...that does not even enter into what the coin looks like.......No doubled die....just machine doubling.

    Thanks,
    Bill
     
  16. jessash1976

    jessash1976 Coin knowledgeable

    thanks, i guess
     
  17. foundinrolls

    foundinrolls Roll Searching Enthusiast

    Hi jessash1976,

    Take a look at the 1983 DDR up there and notice how the lettering is effected makin the letters appear wider that they should. That is characteristic of most types of Doubled Dies.

    Now look at your coin, particularly the I and N...each letter is cut in half (more or less for the sake of example). The lettering does not look wider. What makes the doubled look on your coin is a line caused by machine doubling that is on top of the letters. Essentially, it is metal that was piled on top of the letters.

    Thanks,
    Bill
     
  18. coinprofessor

    coinprofessor New Member

    There's certainly alot of studying to learn what a doubled die looks like and other forms of doubling it takes a long time distinguishing the different forms, as a professor of coins I have learned that it is a science, and a talent to really tell, but once you grasp the concept it's like riding a bike.
    The coin is machine doubling flat like shelf images the A in America is the dead give away.

    The coinprofessor Billy
     
  19. rockdude

    rockdude Coin Collector

    Actually it's called Machine Doubling Damage. And as a professor I'm surprised you didn't mention this.
     
  20. RATCEZ

    RATCEZ New Member

    Yep Machine doubling no double die.
    Tim
     
  21. milkman

    milkman New Member

    That's definetly machine doubling damage.
    Alex
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page