2009--die clas or misalined clash?

what do you think this is?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Sideburns.....:kewl:

 

there are no dings on the 7. A 65 is what my friends and I came up with. The 1930 FH was graded a 63 FH it had a ugly tone so I poped it out diped it and sent it back in to ngc came back a 64 FH. This 1917 came back from ngc 62 FH sent it to anacs also came back a 62 Fh if it goes above 62 in the gray sheet it really jumps in price I'm assuming thats why they graded it what they did.

 

What the.....?

 

dont know how the hell my post got to you sorry.

 

Now I need to hear the 'rest of the story'.

 

I have it posted in the US coins forum under 1917 type 1 quarter

 

as for the original posting:

No clue what you are talking about.

I see nothing.

 

I don't see anythig unusual on this cent

Franke Boy

 

Don't see what your looking at. Got any arrows?

 

Just a die gouge

I think this is the spot what he's talking about looks like a die gouge

Frankie boy

 

Could be but it looks incuse.

 

people asked for better pics I have 3 , but have to put them up 1 at a time for them to zoom here is the first one

 

number 2

 

The upper area is normal, the other area on the neck is post mint damage and the normal out line of the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

 

number 3

 

Looks like the same area a Memorial die-clash would occur.

 

Here's one I found on the log splitter '09, the damage is in about the same place and the design is about the same.

 

Yes with the new pics i would say it's a die clash.
Frankie boy:thumb:

 

Sure looks like a clash.