Is this a doubled die?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by StartingOut, Oct 13, 2009.

  1. StartingOut

    StartingOut Member

    Just checking through some of my mint sets, and found this quite by accident. Would these initials be considered a doubled die?

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. jcuve

    jcuve Lincoln variety fanatic

    Probably not - looks like machine doubling
     
  4. jessash1976

    jessash1976 Coin knowledgeable

    I think I would agree with that. It has the shelf-like appearance which is a good sign that it is MD.
     
  5. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    I would say yes, because if you look at the base of the "f" on the first photo(upside down one) there is definite seperation.
     
  6. jessash1976

    jessash1976 Coin knowledgeable

    Separation? Can you indicate where? I don't see any separation anywhere on the "F". The letters all show signs of machine doubling.But, it is nice to have other opinions, so lets just see what others say.:eek:hya:
     
  7. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    I don't see anything that would indicate doubled die. It appears to be
    MD. The separation is too flattened to be a doubled die. When the hubbing is impressed off target on the second time with the working die ( doubled die), it generally goes almost to the same depth, and thus on the coin impression would be to the same height.

    This is the easiest to see. Notice how where the impressions overlap, the height is so close to the same, they merge. Now imagine the same , only a much smaller spread, and you can see how the edge would look if a doubled die.

    [​IMG]

    Jim
     
  8. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Here is a harder one to see in photo, but with a scope is easy to tell from a MD. 1909VDB DDO.

    [​IMG]
     
  9. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    Right here. Wish I had a high-res to work with though.

    [​IMG][​IMG]
     
  10. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Don't want to bore you, so here are 2 last ones, easy one 1972/72 die #1


    [​IMG]


    And a 1936 DDO.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    Seperation doesn't have to be as drastic as the '55. It can be as little as this:

    [​IMG]
     
  12. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    That's true, but this photo doesn't look as flattened as the Original coin. I can see the point you arrow on your blowup, and perhaps it is rounded enough to indicate a DD, but I can't resolve it well enough to agree myself. I've been wrong before, so it wouldn't shock me, but I still think it is a MD.

    Jim
     
  13. cointime

    cointime New Member

    First of all There's an orange peel effect on the fields near the initials which indicates to me it's Die deterrioration doubling. sorry i don't see any indication of hub doubling on your coin
    Frankie Boy
     
  14. jcuve

    jcuve Lincoln variety fanatic

    MD on proof or satin issues can be deceiving. The flattened areas, what appear doubled, sometimes retains part of the cameo or satin surface instead of the typical metal flow lines. As pointed out, the area is lower (sometimes very low), there are no notches and the design does not increase in size like a doubled die.

    On the example below, you might see what I mean:

    [​IMG]
     
  15. zekeguzz

    zekeguzz lmc freak

    Great work everyone. I really learned some valuable info just now. Thank you much. Very nice pics. zeke:thumb:
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page