First Few out of the roll has lots of what looks to be ddr and ddr with cuds has anyone else have errors like these?
It's a folded over finned rim. A folded over finned rim can often look like a rim cud. Better photos would help for anything you see as far as a DDO/DDR.
@potty dollar 1878 There are cuds that do often look like the OP's coin. They are called rim Cuds. Often small and only cover a small portion of the rim. The above mention of what a cud is can be mis leading. Please take that into consideration when learning. Look at the first two coins in the link below for what a rim cud looks like. http://cuds-on-coins.com/lincoln-cent-cuds-1959-1969/
I do know what rim cuds look like honestly I don't see them unless im thinking its damage the op's pictures aren't the best but not the worst and im not familiar with the golden $1 series.
You should have separated "send them in" from "don't send them in" in your poll. I'm in the "don't send them in" camp. You'd be losing money.
Don't. Sidenote: In my day that word (cud) existed only for describing what a cow chews...and chews and chews. Never heard of it for anything coin-related but I didn't do errors nor notice anything obvious...maybe it's always been there, I dunno. Still, either they don't make 'em like they used to or maybe they ARE again making them like they used to, some 200-250 years ago. Then again, the sheer mintage numbers of today must increase such chances I would think.
I will wait til my 52x currancy microscope comes in and then ill post clearer and closer views every star has what appears to be an extra line to them the inner rim is wider than the rest of the inner rim on the right every tip of each star has a flattened portion also other points of some of the stars plainly have a sunken portion and other has a deep creese line evenly across the side to side points i will circle all when i do the better pix thanks to all for the help
Welcome to CT @Thomas Fellers. From your post, I expected your photos to show examples of what you believe are DDR, but instead I get three poorly photographed items. The advice I give many is this: You should try to post straight on shots, in focus, FULL IMAGE photos (after you upload your photo, two buttons appear: Thumbnail and Full Image, click Full Image and your photo appears full size on your post and is easily enlarged by clicking on it). Photograph coins on neutral backgrounds like black, grey, or white. Crop out superfluous background so just the coin shows, and post photos with correct orientation so members don't have to turn their computer in some awkward fashion to view it properly. While it isn’t always necessary, it is nice to show both the obverse and reverse, even if your question is just about one side. Members can often give more valuable information having both sides to evaluate. Add close ups of areas you have questions about and make your questions as definitive as possible so we know what you are asking for. And try to have the best lighting possible to show the most favorable photo of the coin. Hope this helps in the future. Good luck.
Well, mountain man, you shouldn't expect too much from a newbie rookie as stated in the opening lines. but either way any and all help is appreciated and as I stated I will put better and more definitive pictures with crayon circles around what I'm seeing and thinking is mess ups from the mint. Thanks again
ok finally got my coin microscope. as said before seems to look like alot of die breaks doubling and cudds
forgot to use a crayon to circle the areas, Ietherway if you look at the star tips several have split ends showing doubling cudds also shown on the stars die breaks shown on the stars and some of the feathers have doubling
Never lived on a farm! Never lived in the country! I knew what a cud was from working crossword puzzles, but when I tried to explain what it was to some of these young-uns, all I got was a "Huh?"