Does the date spacing look odd on this 1914D

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by sweet wheatz, Aug 23, 2009.

  1. sweet wheatz

    sweet wheatz Senior Member

    I hink it may be a fake.
    What do you think?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. sweet wheatz

    sweet wheatz Senior Member

  4. kevcoins

    kevcoins Senior Roll Sercher

    looks off to me might have been added
     
  5. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Here is mine - certified VF-20. It looks like the same MM and the samedie punch and the same spacing to me.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Looks genuine to me and I agree with the sellers grade assessment. I see a slight separation of cheek and jaw. I bet that coin goes for $400 or higher.
     
  7. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    It looks good. If I squint really hard I think I can see the crack from the bust to rim.The mm and date spacing looks correct, and the grade is what I expected looking at the coin first.

    Jim
     
  8. Tater

    Tater Coin Collector

    I'm no pro at lincoln cents, but this one looks fine to me. If it is a fake it is a good one.
     
  9. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    For a coin of this catalogue value, I fall back on my personal rule:

    No Slab, No Interest
     
  10. dracula370

    dracula370 Mmmmmmm......Bacon

    Looks mostly fine to me also...is it me or does the mm look a bit less worn than the date?
     
  11. itsallngoodtime

    itsallngoodtime Beachhunter

    I agree looks genuine to me as well, I would say fine grade. I think your right the mm does look less worn than the date but who knows it may just be the picture or a weaker strike on the date.
     
  12. Phil Ham

    Phil Ham Hamster

    It looks good to me also. I would rate it an F-12.
     
  13. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Looks ok , but the pictures aren't really good enought to confirm it or deny it , and at that money it better be slabbed by a good tpg , there's just too many counterfeits out there and not all of them come from China ,
    rzage
     
  14. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I see nothing wrong with the date.

    The ones with an altered date frequently look like this "19 14" (where the 1 was formerly a 4).

    Doesn't look like an added mintmark either (but these are often difficult to detect in photos).
     
  15. Phil Ham

    Phil Ham Hamster

    I'm also basing my decision on the buyer. Frosty has done me ok in the past. The snowman knows his coins.
     
  16. grizz

    grizz numismatist

    .......it's up to you to gamble on the bay. i go with my gut. me no buy.
     
  17. Just Carl

    Just Carl Numismatist

    the date does appear to be real but that is odd that the MM is so clear with so little wear compared to the rest of the coin. That scares me a bit. However, the seller does say no problems with returns.
     
  18. quartertapper

    quartertapper Numismatist

    I feel the coin is genuine, and the seller seems to be open and honest. I just have a hard time spending that kind of money when I'm not face to face with the seller. If you do purchase it, I'd highly recommend getting a few professional opinions on authenticity.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page