United States: copper-nickel Indian Head cent, 1864

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by lordmarcovan, Mar 8, 2021.

?

How interesting/appealing do you find this coin, whether or not you're an expert? (1=worst, 10=best)

  1. 10

    1 vote(s)
    2.5%
  2. 9

    4 vote(s)
    10.0%
  3. 8

    6 vote(s)
    15.0%
  4. 7

    7 vote(s)
    17.5%
  5. 6

    4 vote(s)
    10.0%
  6. 5

    2 vote(s)
    5.0%
  7. 4

    7 vote(s)
    17.5%
  8. 3

    7 vote(s)
    17.5%
  9. 2

    1 vote(s)
    2.5%
  10. 1

    1 vote(s)
    2.5%
  1. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    United States: copper-nickel Indian Head cent, 1864
    01-1864CN-frame.png
    Obverse: Liberty head left, in Indian (Native American) feathered bonnet.
    Reverse: Value within oak wreath tied with ribbon and arrows, shield above.
    Issuer: United States of America, Philadelphia Mint.
    Specifications: Copper-nickel, 19 mm, 4.67 g. Mintage 13,740,000. Coin alignment (↑↓).
    Grade: NGC XF45; cert. #2045066-063. In holder with "Stack's W 57th St Collection" pedigree label.
    Reference: PCGS-2070, Numista-1108.
    Provenance: Ex-David Lawrence Rare Coins, Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA, 7 December 2020.* Prior provenance to Stacks-Bowers Galleries, New York, as indicated by the slab label.
    Notes: the earliest Indian cents of 1859-1864, like the Flying Eagle cents of 1856-1858 which preceded them, were struck in an alloy of 88% copper and 12% nickel. This gave them a much lighter color than the later, thinner bronze cents. The Civil War year of 1864 brought the transition from copper-nickel to bronze cents and this was the final issue and second-lowest mintage of the copper-nickel type.
    Comments: Personally, I like the way some copper-nickel cents acquired a "dirty" sort of toning in circulation, though I suppose "antique patina" would be a fancier way to describe it. The darker toning provides some contrast which sets off the design and lettering. This particular coin is a nice though not exceptional example. I found it wholesome enough to add to my collection. It has a slightly lighter appearance in hand than the photos indicate.

    01-1864CN-frame.png


    02-1864CN-black.png

    03-1864CN-gradient.png

    04-1864CN-white.png

    05-1864CN-coinscape.png

    06-1864CN-obv.png

    07-1864CN-rev.png

    08-1864CN-slab.jpg

    008000S
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    It looks original, with some of the crust bordering on corrosion. There are some minor rim issues and a gouge in the center obverse.

    As with most of the 57th St hoard, this coin was overgraded by at least 10 points. I see it as a VF30 at best. This hoard was an embarrassment for NGC.

    Apologies for the brutally-honest answer, but you did ask for opinions
     
    Mac McDonald and eddiespin like this.
  4. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Actually, I don't entirely disagree with you. I could concur with a VF30-35 opinion. I'm into it for just a smidgen over VF money anyway, per Numismedia trends (and well below XF40 price).

    As I said, "nice, though not exceptional". It was a decent enough circ in my estimation, anyway. I wasn't really seeking it out- I just threw out a bid on it in the DLRC auction because I like this "crusty" look on CuNi cents. I sort of had it in mind to buy it to flip it later. But in the end I decided to keep it, at least until a better one comes along.

    I don't care for the Stack's pedigree label much. For one thing, they used red at the bottom. Ever since the old PCI slabs, I'm conditioned to thinking of red on a slab label as something you see with problem coins.

    This piece does have some minor imperfections, but not so much I'd call it a problem coin, by any means.
     
  5. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    PS- was the Stacks 57th St hoard an actual hoard? Because I don’t trust NGC at all with the use of that term. Their so-called “Colosseum Hoard” labels on ancient coins falsely imply the coins were found at the Colosseum in Rome, when in fact it was apparently nothing but a marketing gimmick. The coins in those holders come from a jumble of different eras that would be highly unlikely to have been found in the same hoard. It smells of boiler room telemarketing hype to me.

    *At least they used the word “Collection” here rather than “Hoard”. I wouldn’t be surprised if they they got some blowback over that “Colosseum Hoard” business. I believe they later amended that to “Colosseum Collection” on those labels as well.
     
  6. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    I think ever coin that NGC certified for the 57th Street Collection is over graded.
     
  7. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    @lordmarcovan
    OK now I went back to read the other comments.
    1-boiler room telemarketing hype BINGO
    2-piece does have some minor imperfections I can assure you if Rob or I sent this in it would have come back as "DETAILs"
    3-Prior provenance to Stacks-Bowers Galleries that alone added points.
    4- and the TPG say they don't know who sent the coins in Interesting
     
    lordmarcovan and eddiespin like this.
  8. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    I gave it a 3. I hate to be a negative Nellie and I'm going to display a bit of my irrational prejudice here.

    I don't like the look of the Cu-Ni small cents, primarily because of the color. The FE and early IHCs have to be in really super MS condition for them to appeal to my aesthetic. That's just my personal preference.

    That said, I agree the coin looks over-graded and I do not like the battle scars above Liberty's ear and along the jaw. Even though they wouldn't merit a details grade IMO, they are still in the major focal area of the obverse.
     
  9. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Well, I personally happen to like the "dirty" look on circulated CuNi Flyers and Indians, as mentioned, but sure, to each his own. I'll agree to disagree with you on that matter of personal preference, but I do not disagree with the rest of what you said.
     
    Stevearino and charley like this.
  10. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I like the crusty original surfaces. For a difficult date coin, it looks really good. Is it massively over graded. NO. Are all the Stack’s coins over graded by NGC? Utter nonsense. Some of them got the benefit of generous grading, but all of them? No way. I would call this coin XF 40, instead of 45. That is no travesty.
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  11. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I only voted "3." The coin is over graded by at least 5 points going by sharpness alone. Beyond that, the darker areas are corrosion. While it's currently arrested and indicates that the coin is original and has not been cleaned, it's not the sort of thing that I would put my collection.
     
    halfcent1793 likes this.
  12. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    Love this one Rob. Crusty original civil war era indian head cent that lived.
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  13. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    When I view this type of wear, my first thought is the history of the date, and the person that may have carried it....on the field of battle...a salve escaping to the North.....a family fleeing from carnage and the coin as part of a survival kit...a good luck piece a soldier kept in his pocket...a remembrance of war by a veteran, etc.

    It is way my mind works.
     
    Dynoking, lordmarcovan and CircCam like this.
  14. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    That coin looks nice enough to add to my collection.
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  15. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    Well said, same here.
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  16. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    Thank You. A fellow history Geek
    A clarification on my post, though: I meant to type slave, not salve.
    The coin may or may not benefit from salve, but it doesn't matter.
    The condition of the piece allows me to mentally build a story of the times.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  17. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    That is not totally the point. When a grading service puts a grade on a coin, it placed a floor value on the piece, at least for some collectors. This is especially true when PCGS and NGC do it.

    When they goof up and over grade a coin, it hurts their image, and it can hurt collectors whose grading skills are not up to par.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  18. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    It is an opinion. The buyer should never base the purchase on the opinion, nor should the buyer be buying if their ability to grade is limited to what the TPG declares by their opinion is the Grade.

    The market, the buyer and the seller, establishes the value, and the TPG or 4PG does not in any manner place a floor value relied upon by buyer and seller. My opinion, of course.
     
  19. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I wasn't commenting on goof ups, TPG's or overgrading. I wasn't commenting on how it affects their image or other collectors. I was simply commenting on the coin itself. It's a nice looking coin. I like it and I would add it to my collection.
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2021
  20. halfcent1793

    halfcent1793 Well-Known Member

    Not XF in my opinion. Also, scratched, rim bump and overall porous. I hope you got it cheap.
     
    johnmilton likes this.
  21. halfcent1793

    halfcent1793 Well-Known Member

    As I understand it, the coins in that hoard came out of bags stuffed in the back of the store that had stuff dumped into them for many years. I.e., they were coins that Stacks didn't really think were worth their time.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page