Am I crazy or are these really nice for the grade?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Danr, Jul 9, 2009.

  1. Danr

    Danr Numismatist

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Arizona Jack

    Arizona Jack The Lincoln-ator

    WOW, I missed this thread or I would own those coins...........

    Even if they upgraded, 64's would get you about 40-45$$$$ each, but the rattler holders, a roll of them would have been well worth selling price.

    There is no profit in paying to resumbit these, but to sell as is would have been easy, at a substantial premium.

    DanR, good eye bud.
     
  4. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    Some look like strong 63's, but I tell you others are 64's, and that is a fact.
    Beautiful coins, and lots of coins in the rattlers are undergraded, not all, but some.
    So yes, those are really nice for the grade.
     
  5. Mark Feld

    Mark Feld Rare coin dealer

    You ARE crazy if you think you can state, as fact, that they are under-graded. I guess you haven't seen enough real life examples of how wonderful coins can look in images compared to how they look in-hand.:rolleyes: And that applies, even to much better images than those.
     
  6. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    :rolling:ummmmm no pity for the winning bidder.:rolling:
     
  7. Danr

    Danr Numismatist

    some might make 64

    [​IMG]
     
  8. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    I said some are 64's, I didn't say that they were all undergraded, but I will say that some of those look undergraded to me, and they look like nice ones for that grade, that is for sure.
     
  9. Mark Feld

    Mark Feld Rare coin dealer

    I didn't say you said they were all under-graded. But you did say, in part "... but I tell you others are 64's, and that is a fact." That sounds WAY too certain to me, based on images.:rolleyes: In fact, I might say the same, even if you had seen them in hand and passed judgment with such certainty.
     
  10. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    I can admit poor choice of words on my part, but solely based on images those look good for the grade, and those are possible candidates for 64's, for sure. (And yes you cannot grade accurately from images, but is always fun to try) :cool:
     
  11. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    Now the winning bidder must decide a few things. Do they send the pieces believed will upgrade, raw or in the original "Rattler" holder ?
    If I were to submit for an upgrade, I would keep them in the holder and bite the bullet if it didn't upgrade. A few may go one or even two grades up. All in all, without upgrades, the investment in this lot was a nice buy, probably about $200.00 less than I would have suspected.
     
  12. xtrmbrdr

    xtrmbrdr Senior Member

    Hard to tell from the photos, especially with no reverse! That said, I see maybe seven, that might possibly be higher grade 63s, maybe 64s. And, at most eight that might be PLs, way too hard to tell from the supplied pics tho. I wonder why no reverse pics?
     
  13. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    Agreed on images point.
     
  14. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Wow - I just need to adjust my definition of low grade. :) Some of them certainly look nice.
     
  15. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Super common coin in a super common grade in a rare (these days) slab, with a small price delta between 63 and 64 grades. Pass.

    That said, they do look nice in the photos (but scans are notorious for hiding problems in coins with mirrored fields), but this seller is no dummy and I suspect he's submitted the really obvious upgrades already.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page