Washington Piece - 1792 Getz Pattern?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by larssten, Feb 10, 2021.

  1. larssten

    larssten Well-Known Member

    Hi!

    A friend of mine purchased this pattern Washington piece which looks like a Getz Pattern. I hadn’t heard about it before I found it in the RedBook.

    Does anyone have any idea if it would be authentic, what variety and if it’s rare or not?

    Thanks for any feedback!

    09D55237-51F9-4F27-9323-E02F86867E0D.jpeg

    78D44A84-E956-452B-9BC1-F84F16B1F378.jpeg

    7086376B-0308-4DC8-9999-DA26AF693FD6.jpeg
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. DarkRage666

    DarkRage666 Ͳìɾҽժղҽʂʂ Ͳąҟҽղ ටѵҽɾ

    I couldn't tell you myself but if it is real! Holy crappola!
     
  4. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Wow , truly cool Coin man. Hefty price tag too . I hope it's the real deal . :rolleyes:
     
  5. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    Yup its pretty rare if real the 2x2 its in looks as old as the coin lol which might help it being authentic but coins like these are often faked this is definitely worth being certified.
     
    DarkRage666 likes this.
  6. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    I wish we could see it out of the 2x2 to see the rim .
     
    DarkRage666 likes this.
  7. BostonCoins

    BostonCoins Well-Known Member

    That is such a cool token and a great history. Unfortunately, I believe that this is in fact a copy or fantasy piece.

    When I compared an actual coin to this one, I saw many identifiable features were conveniently 'worn' or 'mushy'. The one detail I could see that was very different and cannot be explained off as just a worn piece is flare shoulder pieces of washingtons coat. Take a look at the image below. I put a red box around the area I was comparing. The image on the left was taken from PCGS. The image on the right is the image you uploaded.

     
  8. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    Well if its a copy it could be from 1792 still right?and if that it still has some collector premium.
     
    DarkRage666 likes this.
  9. DarkRage666

    DarkRage666 Ͳìɾҽժղҽʂʂ Ͳąҟҽղ ටѵҽɾ

    I agree, looking at it, there are drastic differences between the real one and the copy... 100% fake
     
  10. tommyc03

    tommyc03 Senior Member

    Unless obscured by wear I am not seeing the fourth lapel button nor the slot for the top button. Also, on reverse, I am only seeing 5 arrows instead of 6. I am not an expert on these but comparisons can be telling.
     
  11. YoloBagels

    YoloBagels Well-Known Member

    Sorry to say but this is a counterfeit. As others have stated, the details don't match authentic examples at all.

    The grainyness, wire rims, weakness on random areas, and strange/inaccurate details give it away.
     
  12. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    It most likely is from the 1950's or later. TONS of colonial era coins were copied in this timeframe as coin collecting boomed and people wanted copies and no one thought it was a big deal to copy these. Just from the photo you can tell its a cast copy, but then @BostonCoins did an excellent comparison for you.
     
  13. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    The problem with these is like Continental currency dollars, for every genuine there are thousands of fakes.
     
    Pickin and Grinin and medoraman like this.
  14. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Thought you had a problem hanging with us, you know the knowledgeable ones.
    We were too hard on your young soul. Tis always best to think twice before you cry wolf, Young man.
    As a referendum the piece screams fake.
     
    CoinCorgi likes this.
  15. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    This is the closest thing I have ever owned to the OP piece. It's by the same hand. I had it certified and sold it when I was a dealer. The coin should be really sharp and nice even with the damage because Getz was a very talented die sinker.

    1791 Washington Cent O.jpg 1791 Washington Cent R.jpg
     
  16. John Burgess

    John Burgess Well-Known Member

    Nevermind. I gave up on this. too complicated, and likely a modern reproduction.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2021
  17. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I don't believe it's by the same artist, That is a Conder token from Middlesex, and I believe the engraver for that was John Hancock of Birmingham.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page