new lincoln ddr discovered, bootstrap

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by grizz, Jun 25, 2009.

  1. grizz

    grizz numismatist

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    fancy name for a common error.
     
  4. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Its just hype. Find an error, give it a fancy name and a whole lot of hype, and you might be able to make suckers and fools out of people on Ebay.

    And its not a DDR. Its not a major error. Its only barely interesting. Its a common die crack.
     
  5. just coins

    just coins New Member

    Interesting post thanks

    JC
     
  6. ziggy9

    ziggy9 *NEC SPERNO NEC TIMEO*

    And it is NOT a variety!
     
  7. coleguy

    coleguy Coin Collector

    Is a die crack even technically an error?
    Guy~
     
  8. ziggy9

    ziggy9 *NEC SPERNO NEC TIMEO*

    No, it is the result of normal wear and tear on the die and is within exceptable parameters for the mint. Some people forget that the mint's purpose is to produce quantity not quality and many of these type things are acceptable.

    Richard
     
  9. just coins

    just coins New Member

    There was a recent post on here about what is an error a well known expert stated he considers die cracks, die chips, die gouges ,etc etc all errors .

    His explaination was I DO CONSIDER THEM ERRORS BECAUSE THEY DON'T BELONG THERE of course it's a matter of opinion that's what the coin world is all about opinonated. I'm one that happens to agree with him.



    I would say the die crack is an exstreme one that's why they are calling it an error
    JC Joe
     
  10. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    'new lincoln ddr discovered, bootstrap '

    Not a DDr, a silly die crack.

    A nice one, but not headline news!
     
  11. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Yea......RIGHT! :mouth: ROFL
     
  12. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

  13. AUBU2

    AUBU2 Senior Member

    Bootstrap

    They claim that all of the errors studied so far are the same, no gradual degrading as in a standard die crack. Since the crack might be the result of a new die, every coin struck with this die will be the same. Thus creating a variety, not die crack errors that create unique coins with each strike.
     
  14. grizz

    grizz numismatist

    ........i'm sure this would be very exciting for a new young collector. as far as others, well, it's your choice. if it interests you then that's good, if not then you move on to something that DOES! I REPORT, YOU DECIDE! (big tongue in cheek) inserted here.
     
  15. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    LOL - yep. Something young collectors, without cash, can search for, find and enjoy until their hearts are content. Sometimes just the hunt can be interesting and fun.
     
  16. ziggy9

    ziggy9 *NEC SPERNO NEC TIMEO*


    They also state that the sample base of 300 coins is too small to determine if there is any deterioration. Even a crack that exists on the first coin will eventially deteriorate over the course of its life. It would have to as it is damage to the die and repeated striking will eventually increase the damage. The article is hype to get the interest flowing on this coin so they can sell it to people who don't know better. the price will go up but eventually it will go back down. This is the same strategy used in the 50;s and 60's to sell "BIE" die chips as major errors. most of them you can't give away today.

    Richard
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page