double florin's

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by davemac, Jun 16, 2009.

  1. davemac

    davemac dave

    :eek:hya:
    I have 2 double florin's 1st one 1887 the other 1890 but i am as you all know no good at grading can you help and tell me the diffrence between roman and arabic florin's
    Thank's dave
    The pics i will post in a min
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. davemac

    davemac dave

    pics

    dont know what happened but could not post the pic's first time
     

    Attached Files:

  4. Ardatirion

    Ardatirion Où est mon poisson

    Roman and Arabic refer to the date. ie, 1856 vs MDCCCLVI
     
  5. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Just so you arer not confused Dave the ones you have there are Arabic :thumb: The Roman would look like MDCCCLVI
     
  6. davemac

    davemac dave

    which

    :rolleyes:
    But which do i have ?
    Roman
     
  7. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Um no as I said in the post above yours the ones you have are the Arabic :D
     
  8. davemac

    davemac dave

    you got there before me

    ok not roman candid camera
     
  9. John the Jute

    John the Jute Collector of Sovereigns

    Arabic vs Roman

    I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with De Orc--always a dangerous move. I agree with him that you have an "Arabic" 1887, but for a different reason.

    My understanding is that this difference applies only to the 1887 double florin. (Double florins were issued for only 4 years--1887 to 1890--I guess the Victorian public was not ready for decimalization!) The first dies had a capital I in the date instead of the more normal Arabic numeral 1. So it read "I887" instead of "1887". I think it was a mistake; at any rate, the Mint changed it during the year.

    Later,

    John
     
  10. John the Jute

    John the Jute Collector of Sovereigns

    Grading a Queen Victoria jubilee head

    Hi Dave,

    UK grading benchmarks (which are different from US benchmarks and probably different again from Irish benchmarks) call for the lace around the Queen's head to be intact for a VF grade. On the other hand, the medal on her shoulder could have disappeared altogether and the coin would still grade as Fine.

    So your coins are between F and VF; would you believe GF?

    Usual caveat: I'm an enthusiast, not an expert.

    Later,

    John
     
  11. davemac

    davemac dave

    reply

    :rolling:
    Understand the the rom and arabic but know notting about the lace but i am looking at the ear and the necklace which are very clear
    And i cannot understand vg iam going to bed and hope that you can come to agree on the grade i paid 20 euro a coin for them was i done
     
  12. byrd740

    byrd740 Numismatist

    Just saw this thread. I agree with John here. This applies only to the 1887 and it is an I in the date instead of 1. And as to grade, I think a solid Fine should do it.

     
  13. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Grading by UK standards, I would agree with gF for them. Grading by American standards, I would say they qualify for VF.
     
  14. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Yes you are quite right John I should have mentioned the Roman I but it was late and I was tired :whistle:
     
  15. davemac

    davemac dave

    thanks

    :high5:
    Thank's to eveyone for the grade and the history
    Dave
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page