New Purchase: Smashing 1958 Toned Mint Set

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Magman, Jun 1, 2009.

  1. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    Here's just a taste, I'll post the rest tomorrow once I can get some good pictures ;)


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. the_man12

    the_man12 Amateur Photographer

    Those look nice! For some reason there are a lot of nicely toned 1958 coins.
     
  4. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    thanks to the tissue paper and cardboard it was in :) (for the mint sets that is)
     
  5. Danr

    Danr Numismatist

    true dat
     
  6. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

  7. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    Reverse of the quarter ;)

    [​IMG]
     
  8. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    Now I have to go look at my sets.
    I think I have Mint sets back to 1950 (it's been a long time since they've seen the light of day and my mind is a bit fuzzy -- age thing).
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Has to be more to it than that. All of them from '47 thru '58 had the same holders, but only the '58 is really known for spectacular toning. Sure it happened with other dates, but only in isolated cases.
     
  10. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    57 is also found spectacularly toned, as are occasionally the 56s. I suspect the type of cardboard these coins were shipped with (and the sulfur contained therein) caused the toning. It would be interesting to do some research to see if the sourcing of the cardboard (or the manufacturing process) changed over that time period.
     
  11. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    ah, OK. I said that since I've seen '56 and '57 sets with some fantastic toning too. :)
     
  12. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    I wanna see the rest...
    Good enough to make me drool?... MMMMMM MMM GOOD?
     
  13. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    [​IMG]

    I can't get a good picture of the Reverse.

    The other Franklin is blue on the obverse and other colors on the reverse (but nothing like that quarter).
    The cents arent picture worthy, and the nickels arent too bad - one of them is also blue (lot's of blue coins, which I like).

    Here's the other quarter.
    Unfortunately the obverse has that non-lustrous toning :(
    The other dime has this type on the entire obverse, but the reverse is nice, which makes it look strange.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    So have I...

    [​IMG]

    ;)

    p.s. nice set, BTW.
     
  15. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    WOW! That frankie is a beauty!
     
  16. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Nice coins - all of them.
     
  17. Arizona Jack

    Arizona Jack The Lincoln-ator

    Holy cow Mag, whered you dig this set up? First I have heard of it, and WOW, nice one. Bring it to the show in Scottsdale Sunday and let me see it in hand, you might want to placticize some of them:cool:
     
  18. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    Oh yeah, I'll bring them by :)

    And just like I said, I may want to send them to NGC (possible Stars?). We'll see.

    Also, I'm going to send that crazy Frankie to Todd (where Charmy sends them) to get a good photo taken, because as we know, toners are super hard to take a picture of.
     
  19. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Nice coins!!!!

    BTW, you will get better pix if you take them out of the 2X2's.
     
  20. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    Thanks :)

    and I know, but my photography station is my camera, hand, and window open, lol.

    I'll just pay the pro's to take clear, straight (non angled) pics. :D
     
  21. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    Always hard to get good pics!
    Took me 5 years, to learn how to use my camera!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page