Do you think ANACS was harsh on this 1914D?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BadThad, May 28, 2009.

  1. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    I really, really thought this coin was an F12, lowest VG-10.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    At least they (like NGC) couldn't detect my little secret. :D Anyone see the spot of obverse verdigris I removed?

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    That coin is definitely not a F12. I guess I could see VG10, but my grade would be the same as ANACS.

    Spot? South of the "LIBERTY"?
     
  4. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    By the "N"?

    Jim
     
  5. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    I agree with rlm that it is a VG-10 tops. I think ANACS is really tightening the screws on their grading. It's good as a buyer, but not so much for the seller/submitter...:D
     
  6. NPCoin

    NPCoin Resident Imbecile

    The reverse does it in for me. I'd say ANACS was generous on this one. But, then again, I'm kind of hard to please.
     
  7. Morgan1878

    Morgan1878 For A Few Dollars More..


    That's because you buy the "coin" and not the "holder"..
     
  8. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    I think VG8 is the right grade...
    The wheat stalks, and jaw, are not in enough good detail to be in F, and are worn.
    What stalks show signs of a VG10 maybe, but the spots, nicks, and overall wear on the coin bring it down
    I think VG8 was a good grade for the coin, and I think ya' should be proud of this coin :)
     
  9. mralexanderb

    mralexanderb Coin Collector

    I think that the ANACS VG 8 is right on. There are minimal details on the wheat stalks. The cheek and jaw are worn smoothe. I gotta say they got it right on this coin without the expected upgrade some TPGs give to key & semi-key coins. I've had some coins graded by ANACS to make sure they were genuine and they graded them as I thought they should have been.

    Bruce
     
  10. NPCoin

    NPCoin Resident Imbecile

    I just do not like merged legends on my VG coins, no matter how weakly struck it is.
     
  11. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Just to give you a little perspective, does anyone want to guess the grade of this coin? Obviously, based solely on the wheat lines.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    Based upon my experiences with ANACS since they changed ownership, they've REALLY tightened the screws on grading.
    I suspect they are trying to improve their rating in the greysheet and the numismatic community in general.
     
  13. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Nope because that wheat looks clearly like weak strike versus wear. I was thinking vg-10 for the original coin.
     
  14. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I'm agree with the grading of the coin. VG8 looks right to me.

    I'm going to say this coin is an extremely weak strike. It almost appears to be some luster around the devices. I could see this coin being an AU despite the wheat stalks being so poor.
     
  15. Half Dollar*

    Half Dollar* Numismaniac

    I think VG-8 is fair.
     
  16. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    After I posted this last night I spent about an hour on ha.com, the grade is consistent with other ANACS VG's I saw.

    Thanks for the opinions everyone!
     
  17. Phil Ham

    Phil Ham Hamster

    I also think ANACS got it correct. I guessed a VG-8 before seeing the grade. It is a "nice" VG-8 though. The coin doesn't seem to have any major dings or scratches with a pretty good rim. Also, you can sort of make out the wheat lines.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page