1965 Kennedy Half with Mirror-like Fields?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Aslanmia, May 9, 2009.

  1. Aslanmia

    Aslanmia Active Member

    Not sure if I have anything here or not, but when I was going through some coins to put on the Bay I noticed that this 1965 half had mirror-like fields but no cameo effect.

    I know the SMS coins can come in cameo and ultra-cameo, but how about mirror-like fields? How can I tell if it came from an SMS set? The Redbook isn't much help at all... :p
     

    Attached Files:

    • obv.jpg
      obv.jpg
      File size:
      111.2 KB
      Views:
      116
    • rev.jpg
      rev.jpg
      File size:
      126 KB
      Views:
      136
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Don't know too much about Kennedys , my guess is it may just be a PL early die run piece . Still a nice coin .
    rzage
     
  4. ML94539

    ML94539 Senior Member

    1965 SMS Kennedys look like proofs.
     
  5. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Thanks , learn something new every day here .
    rzage:D:thumb:
     
  6. zerocd

    zerocd Member

    Nice looking coin.

    Whenever I find a light box I can make I will photo some other clad years that have a finish like that. Years that did not have mint sets but must have had some nice early business strikes.

    0CD
     
  7. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    some of them do anyway.
    Some of them look like nice mint sets, others are more proof-like :)
     
  8. Aslanmia

    Aslanmia Active Member

    I hear that...

    I've owned a few SMS in the past, and they definately looked more like business strikes then proofs. It's also funny how the Redbook doesn't even list a proof for 1965 and they don't even mention the SMS either.

    So there's no definitive way to tell if a coin is from an SMS?

    I'm just wondering how common something like this is, and if it's worth taking extra, extra special care of. :)
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    There are no Proofs for '65, '66 or '67 - in any denomiantion. There were business strikes and SMS sets and that's it.

    Now, as to how to tell, on some examples it is easy and on other examples it is not easy. Even the foremost experts had trouble telling an SMS coin from a business strike. There have been many arguments among the pros over this point. PCGS has even slabbed some as SMS that were later proved not to be SMS at all.

    So to ask us here to identify the coin based on pics - is an effort in futility.
     
  10. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    PL's & Cameo

    What look for in the SMS years are Cameo. they are rare but not to hard to spot here a 1967 that MS-66 Cameo
     

    Attached Files:

  11. Aslanmia

    Aslanmia Active Member

    Thanks for the input, folks.

    As I said before, there's no cameo (well, unless you angle it just right like the reverse in the pics) but it's the only non-proof Kennedy I have that has mirror fields.

    Hmmm... What to do, what to do...
     
  12. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    If it has mirror fields like an older non-cameo proof than it is likely a SMS Kennedy.
     
  13. bhp3rd

    bhp3rd Die varieties, Gems

    It's a SMS coin very easy to tell look at the rim,

    It's a SMS coin very easy to tell look at the rim, it is flat and has knife like edge - business strike coins do not have that.
     
  14. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    While I agree that it is an SMS coin in this case...not all the SMS coins have definitive diagnostics to tell. When the dies had worn a bit it becomes very hard to tell a SMS from a business strike.
     
  15. bhp3rd

    bhp3rd Die varieties, Gems

    I have never experienced any trouble at all.

    I have never experienced any trouble at all.
    I agree it may be difficult for some when SMS dies get a little worn and business strikes are strong but after a few years and seeing a few thousand SMS coins I have never had trouble telling the difference with it at all.
     
  16. quartertapper

    quartertapper Numismatist

    The Redbook does list the Special Mint Sets just after the mint sets. If you are looking at the 2009 edition, it's on page 335. Don't believe the pricing though, you'd be really lucky to find someone to pay that much!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page