Guess the AT coins

Here are three coins from my collection. Just guess which are AT.
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/4c602cff76f547828ba45843eab3b91a
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/af995150001b42d689e352f39c060458

http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/eff7611b9b20432aac4e26e1d6e0a2de
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/99241be30a4945c1a8a90dba88da9a2f

http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/42fdcc395de3460d935968099a189ed8
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/a5e8dc3cdcf2482497ed533ac4fc94dc

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Uhh, all of them? For sure the Liberty Nickel.

 

To me, it seems as if all of them are AT

 

I'll wait for a few more responses and then I'll tell the results.

 

At first they all seemed to have a heat treatment look to them. Unless the pics are misleading there doesn't seem to be much other color then red in there, except for the quarter, which appears to have maybe been in a coin book at one time.

Circulated coins IMHO don't make for great toners. Maybe because they have been exposed to perspiration among other things.

Tough question, can't wait to heard the answer.

Allen

 

Whatever. I'll just tell you guys. They are all ATd. Only the top two are heat treated. The quarter was painted with bleach. Thanks for guessing.

 

You should have let this bait soak in the water for a little while longer....

I was gonna guess #1 and #2. #3 looked questionable, but wasn't sure.

That said, the pics make determining NT/AT even more difficult than it is with the coin in-hand (dicey)....Mike

 

I have some other ones. I'll put them up as soon as I can get pics.

 

Not a bad thing. I was the one who did it as an experiment last year. I have some more difficult to tell ones too.

 

Pics that are straight down on the coin would be better.

 

Yep more time needed , I was going to say the Washington for sure , the top two I wasn't sure about but thought they looked Baked , AJ gave a good suggestion awhile ago , take a roll of garbage pre '82 cents and destroy them , he meant bake them , dip them , whizz them anything you can think of , then you'll know what they look like , I'm going to get a roll of pre '64 qaurters and do the same thing .
rzage

 

I have tested out more than a roll of pre-82's. I'll never get burned on a copper for cleaning or artificial toning if I see it in hand. Silver, I'm better than my local dealer at it.

 

BTW I would do dimes instead. Less to lose.

 

http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/ae45abbc18c54ad19809b30f5a55b869
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/5b0e3ce1981b4042bb51573b3c5b7513

 

Some more...
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/a1017f5530c74403b9251d0bb9ae64a4
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/534db21498554cc0be321512ea51a4aa

http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/86f9f1b0ebbd4234b8c8e3a02ec06ad8
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/447890286aa64fc9b35b09a362346c57

http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/3ce2b197b7dd471d910081498e040021
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/adb3edeab9814fc8840218a33f75d6bd

 

that Columbian doesn't look bad , Morgan definately looks AT ,What happened to the Morgan?
rzage:whistle:

 

every last one of them.

Why are you trying it on so many coins? You trying to become a coin doc?

The method you are using is very crude and will not replicate natural toning so why waste your time ruining coins?

 

I actually think circulated toners are very cool and they are super hard to find. Here are a few of my best

 

First off, your guess is off, second, I don't do it anymore. I did it last year to learn how to detect it and now I know.

 

Try to guess this one.
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/48ac2a6d544344459db81824c1baa111
http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/205ee4261fb547a0b8b7abb5ec373adc