1942. Thanks. http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/914455e5702c43438ef5d254e48e1d64 http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/2e542caf950d4beab83bfaddf5816979
Angled photos make judging luster/wear/grade very difficult for me. I guessed AU 58 because I think I see some impaired luster, but any grade up to and including 64 wouldn't surprise me either....Mike
I voted for MS65 earlier tonight. I don't see any wear. And I don't see alot of marks on this coin either. You are certainly right about the angled photos though. That factor made me alot less confident about my opinion on this one.
I grade it very, very big. kidding. MS63. I see some wear on the branch. Maybe its just me. Real nice though.
Here are some straight on pictures. http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/1a1543180c4e4b6c8843f0d26b4a5fcc http://api.photoshop.com/home_265fc...be-px-assets/dc4e5db94a5547a0a71df20d8822b966 Color is a bit off, but it will do.
Going by the new pics I would change my grade from 65 to 63. I'm still not sure these pics are good enough though. And you're right, that color looks weird, lol.
Haha yeah, it's blast white in hand. A dealer that I became friends with bought a roll of these at an estate sale for $30. At least 9 coins came back MS66. Not sure about the rest except I know this one is not MS66. I couldn't afford one in that condition anyways.