GTG - 1927 1c

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by CircCam, Dec 2, 2020.

  1. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    1. TrueView
    60C488F2-0E26-4D89-838C-EAA942717381.jpeg
    2.
    D9D53FCB-737E-4B33-89B9-940012C751AB.jpeg
    3. 1B9D19C9-B861-4628-8F89-8820FF6A3177.jpeg

    This one has three different views, I re-imaged it (photo #2) because I felt my first attempt (photo #3) was way too flattering to the surfaces. I got caught up trying to show the excellent luster of this coin, but included those to give a view of the flashy luster for guessing since the TrueView doesn’t.
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2020
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    My first impression was MS64 RB, but since I was high one grade on both of your recent GTGs, I am guessing that the high quality photos are presenting these coins in their best possible light so I am going to subtract a grade.

    MS63 RB
     
  4. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    I'm at MS-63 also
     
  5. erscolo

    erscolo Well-Known Member

    I will be the odd one out (which is usually the case) and go with MS64 RB. A nice coin though I remain partial to red.
     
  6. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    I like the Purple "HAZE" man. Far out .
     
    Penny Luster and JCKTJK like this.
  7. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

  8. JCKTJK

    JCKTJK Well-Known Member

    All In My Brain!
     
    Penny Luster likes this.
  9. JCKTJK

    JCKTJK Well-Known Member

    MS far out!
     
  10. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    @JCKTJK . You must be a West Coast Guy , LOL;)
     
    JCKTJK likes this.
  11. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Nice looking coin. The issue that I see and probably the graders is the spotting especially on the obverse. It appears to have the luster of a 65, the surface chatter of a 64, but those spots dragged it down to a 63 with the color being a RB. So 63RB final answer.
     
  12. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

  13. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    64 BN, though 64+ or 65 wouldn't surprise me.

    Another nice one, regardless.
     
  14. JCKTJK

    JCKTJK Well-Known Member

    Nope, East Coast!
     
    Mainebill and SensibleSal66 like this.
  15. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    MS-63RB. Obverse spotting and nicks. Reverse stain in left field, and a scar below RI. I think it it just barely edges into RB territority and would have graded 64 without the spotting on the obverse and scar on the reverse. Pretty coin though and thanks for sharing the multiple photos so we could see it clearly.
     
  16. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Same here 64BN. Phil Photo'd this to try and make it look RB. As a bump, the luster looks awesome. I would guess it is more BN like photos 2 and 3.
     
    JCKTJK likes this.
  17. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I think you read my mind! My first impression was 64, but that spotting knocked me down to 63, along with the fact that I have been one grade high on all his GTGs.
     
  18. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    Given the spots in one of the photos, my grade would be MS-63, brown.
     
  19. beaver96

    beaver96 Well-Known Member

    The grading class given on this website is priceless.
    I'll agree with MS63 BN.
     
    Penny Luster likes this.
  20. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    64 RB. But I may be one high but that’s my grade is 64 I’ll see what pcgs gave it
     
  21. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page