Featured The Modesty of Emperors

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Sulla80, Aug 22, 2020.

Tags:
  1. jamesicus

    jamesicus Well-Known Member

    Thanks for posting that, Al - always a good resource. I have the same edition as you.

    James
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2020
    Sulla80 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Al Kowsky

    Al Kowsky Well-Known Member

    James, I really treasure that book, all 929 pages of it :D! Considering when that book was compiled, 1889, without the use of the internet, it was a staggering accomplishment & is still valuable today. The "old timers" need to be taken seriously.
     
    Edessa and Sulla80 like this.
  4. jamesicus

    jamesicus Well-Known Member

    Thank you, I wasn’t aware that BMCRE was online that way. There used to be a link to an online edition via a site in India, but I understand there was some doubt as to its legitimitacy.
     
  5. jamesicus

    jamesicus Well-Known Member

    +1

    I am afraid my copy has become quite “dog-eared”, Al.

    9BFA830E-8614-4900-AE8F-649B570A67F0.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2020
    Sulla80 and Orfew like this.
  6. Edessa

    Edessa Well-Known Member

    Domitian, Augustus, AD 81-96. AR Denarius (19mm, 3.4g). Rome mint. Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG – GERM P M TR P IIII; Laureate head right, wearing aegis. Rev: IMP VIIII COS XI - CENS POT P P; Minerva standing left with spear. Ref: C 176; BMC 80; RIC 339.

    zaa.jpg
     
    Bing, Limes, Orfew and 4 others like this.
  7. hotwheelsearl

    hotwheelsearl Well-Known Member

    That's odd, as this Justin I follis appears to also have PP, despite being 150 years after Theodosius I..

    Justin I Constantinople SB63.JPG
    Justin I AE Follis
    Obv: DNIVSTI NVSPPAVG
    Rev: Large M, Star Left, Cross Right
    Mint: Constantinople
    Reference: SB 63
     
  8. Al Kowsky

    Al Kowsky Well-Known Member

    As Severus Alexander stated in his post "P.P." no longer had the same meaning on late Roman & Byzantine coins ;).
     
  9. Severus Alexander

    Severus Alexander find me at NumisForums

    Thanks for the further info, Al! A classic book, for sure - I did a bit more digging and this does sound like a very plausible cutoff. (I definitely felt the need to dig more, though, as Stevenson is apparently not 100% accurate:
    Screen Shot 2020-08-23 at 12.58.37 PM.jpg
    This seems rather unlikely as he wasn't even governor of Pannonia Superior yet, never mind emperor!)

    Here's some corroboration from Brill's New Pauly, which is a good scholarly source. I can't access the whole entry though.

    Then I had some fun with EAGLE, the Electronic Archive of Greek and Latin Epigraphy (search here or here). The latest record I found for "Pater Patriae" fully written out rather than inferred from "PP" is for Valentinian I in Sardinia:

    M(ilia) p(assuum) [---].
    D(omino) n(ostro) Valentiniano Aug(usto),
    trib(uniciae) potestatis, pater
    patriae, viam quae a
    5 [Karalibus ducit Olb(iam)]
    vetustate corruptam
    restituit,
    curante Fl(avio) Maximino
    [pro]curatore suo.
    Obviously that's getting pretty close to Theo. I wonder if Theo was the last to be Pater Patriae since he was the last to head a unified empire. It doesn't seem to make sense for the Patria to have two Paters...
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2020
    Limes and jamesicus like this.
  10. Al Kowsky

    Al Kowsky Well-Known Member

    S.A., That's a good point ;). Since Theodosius I was the last single emperor to rule the empire how could two emperor rule justify the use of P.P. o_O. I guess we should cut Stevenson some slack, I'm sure lots of his info was anecdotal :smuggrin:. When you look at the size of his book it seems incomprehensible anyone person could have researched all that info in one lifetime :rolleyes:.
     
  11. ancientone

    ancientone Well-Known Member

    Evidently there was no modesty for Domitian. He accepted PP on the day the Senate granted his powers.

    domitian.jpg Domitian AR denarius, Rome Mint. 86 AD.
    Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM PM TRP VIII, laureate head right.
    Rev: IMP XIX COS XIIII CENS PPP, Minerva walking right, wielding a spear and holding shield on left arm.
     
    Edessa, Bing, Sulla80 and 3 others like this.
  12. jamesicus

    jamesicus Well-Known Member

    Yes that is how I assess it Al. But I will say that I have found much useful information in this dictionary that was not available anywhere else.
     
    Sulla80 likes this.
  13. Sulla80

    Sulla80 Well-Known Member

    Worth noting that the challenge of two "Pater"s came up with Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus - and didn't seem to create any issue. See the OP reference:

    "Receipt of PP in AD 166 accords with the evidence of the Historia Augusta that Marcus was offered the PP nomen while Verus was absent at the Parthian War but deferred taking it until his brother's return (SHA Marc. 9.1-3). After Verus had returned victorious from Syria in 166, PP was decreed to both because Marcus, in the absence of Verus, had conducted himself 'most moderately' (moderatissime) towards senators and ordinary men."
    - Tom Stevenson (2008) Numismatic Chronicle

    I find utility in older resources and some even a bit older than Stevenson e.g. Pliny, Plutarch, Appian, Dio Cassius, Cicero, Caesar, Livy, Paterculus, Sallust.....I don't want to go out too far on a limb, but there may have been one or two Greeks worth reading too.
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2020
    Severus Alexander likes this.
  14. Sulla80

    Sulla80 Well-Known Member

    There is an argument that he may have waited a few months and accepted at the same time as he became Pontifex Maximus with numismatic evidence that the first TRP COS VII silver and gold issues are without "P.P.". The "Group 1" denarii are listed as 13-September to 31-December AD 81 in RIC II (p.266).
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2020
    ancientone likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page