1932 d quarter

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Muzzman, Aug 18, 2020.

  1. Muzzman

    Muzzman Member

    I found this in a river. Silver, weighs 6.25 grams, diameter 24.11mm, thickness 1.56mm. It has die chip errors, the date was stamped 3 times, the mint mark is not glued on but yet doesn't sit in a depression. Could that be another error? Is the coin real or fake?
     

    Attached Files:

    capthank likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. John Burgess

    John Burgess Well-Known Member

    I'd say it's a fake from the pictures but take it to a coin shop or two and get a couple in person opinion's before spending money on authentication and, the only way you are going to get decent value for it is having it certified. There's a whole lot of fakes out there. Date and mint mark look wrong on it as if theyve been worked.
    It's likely a silver quarter, might even be a 1932D that someone worked on heavily trying to make it better and ruined it...
    There's a lot that looks wrong here to me.
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2020
  4. gronnh20

    gronnh20 Well-Known Member

    Looks fake to me.
     
    capthank, GH#75 and spirityoda like this.
  5. Handyman

    Handyman Well-Known Member

    Well I'm no expert on quarters but it appears to me to be real, it has DDD also die chips I don't see any reason for this coin to be faked. Jmo
     
    capthank likes this.
  6. Peter Economakis

    Peter Economakis Well-Known Member

    Muzzman, were you the one to clean it to see it's details after it was in the river for a while?
    The 2 looks different but i'm really a novice. This pic of another 32D is from usacoins.
    Nice find!
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 18, 2020
    Spark1951 likes this.
  7. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    Looks totally fake....especially the 32 . Here's A pic of real 1932-D from this site...

    IMG_4696.jpg
     
  8. LakeEffect

    LakeEffect Average Circulated Supporter

    Agree - the date is a mess, sorry.
     
    GH#75 likes this.
  9. Peter Economakis

    Peter Economakis Well-Known Member

    If it were to be faked, what original date quarter would they use, or does it look like the date was ground off and the 3 and 2 were added?
    The D on the back is also suspect like the PO mentioned..
     
    capthank likes this.
  10. John Burgess

    John Burgess Well-Known Member

    My thought is they trimmed a 1932 quarter on the 32 and used the extra metal to make the D on the reverse. But that's specualtion.
    Like I said there is so much wrong here I cant confirm it's legit so I have to call it a fake.
     
    Peter Economakis likes this.
  11. GenX Enthusiast

    GenX Enthusiast Forensic grammatician

    I scrolled down slowly from the top of the coin and actually laughed out loud when I saw the date.
     
    spirityoda likes this.
  12. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    I think a real silver quarter, with a faked date
     
    capthank and spirityoda like this.
  13. Fred Weinberg

    Fred Weinberg Well-Known Member

    counterfeit coin
     
  14. Heavymetal

    Heavymetal Well-Known Member

    And back to the river it should go
     
  15. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE....:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::wacky::wacky::wacky:
     
  16. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    Another clue/red flag would be look at the toning on the date....it was left there to hide either the grinding of the 32 or the glue where the 32 was added.
     
    capthank likes this.
  17. Muzzman

    Muzzman Member

    No I didn't do anything with it. Cleaning coins hurts the value of them. It would be a good find if it's real. Thanks. Yeah the 2 looks different but I don't know if it's because of it being struck 3 times. That's why I'm here with it. I took it to a place and they looked it over and said nice find. A key date and offered to buy it. I told them that I wasn't ready to sell it not knowing anything about it.
     
    capthank and Peter Economakis like this.
  18. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    Its bad, the date is crudely faked.
     
  19. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Even without looking at the date you can tell it isn't a 1932, Compare the IGWT to the real 32 posted by spirityoda. Note the strength of the motto and the height of the center point of the W.
     
    GenX Enthusiast likes this.
  20. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    The "32" in the date is all wrong. I agree with @Treashunt that it is probably a real silver quarter, but the date was crudely altered.
     
  21. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    Still, quite an interesting river find. Neat conversation piece. Bad fake, but interesting in spite of that. And in some ways, because of that.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page