Mintmark

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Chip Kirkpatrick, Aug 9, 2020.

  1. Chip Kirkpatrick

    Chip Kirkpatrick Well-Known Member

    I keep looking at this mintmark. Opinions? 8919AEA5-6CA2-42E7-A10F-87FD47825022.jpeg 658D7D02-3B55-4A4E-8A7E-CFEBEFA79442.jpeg 18355BBE-6FF4-4D1F-8F44-EA8316199535.jpeg
     
    Chip Kirkpatrick, Aug 9, 2020
    #1 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Danomite

    Danomite What do you say uh-huh

    Looks like DDD. It’s also present in IGWT. I don’t remember and rpms for 1980 WQs. That coin appears heavily pitted probably from environmental damage. JMHO
     
    Danomite, Aug 9, 2020
    #2 + Quote Reply
  4. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    That D Mint Mark just has a Die Chip, Chip ;)
     
    paddyman98, Aug 9, 2020
    #3 + Quote Reply
    Robert Ransom likes this.
  5. GenX Enthusiast

    GenX Enthusiast Forensic grammatician

    Looks like the whole surface of the coin has been damaged on both sides, blurring the features. Could be a die chip in the date as stated above.
     
    GenX Enthusiast, Aug 9, 2020
    #4 + Quote Reply
  6. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    It's a D with a worn die chip. The rest of the coin is also worn.
     
    Collecting Nut, Aug 9, 2020
    #5 + Quote Reply
  7. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    1 more toward 32,000. :D
     
    Robert Ransom, Aug 9, 2020
    #6 + Quote Reply
  8. GenX Enthusiast

    GenX Enthusiast Forensic grammatician

    Is it possible it's been plated at one point? It would explain the general mushiness...
     
    GenX Enthusiast, Aug 9, 2020
    #7 + Quote Reply
  9. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    I'm on @paddyman98's side on this one. Appears to me to just be a filled MM plus circulation wear and tear.
     
    Mountain Man, Aug 9, 2020
    #8 + Quote Reply
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page