Unique PDS Matte Proof Classic Commems!

CoinCorgi, posted: "Or he could of just posted a link."

My "friends" like to say that "Insider is an old man who knows virtually nothing about computers, photographing coins, and most things in life." I'm also careful not to break any possible copyright rules or encourage anyone from leaving CT.

Some very knowledgeable posters over there could have answered the grading question I posted here in one sentence - yet they did not and I CANNOT. I want you guys to take a stab.

Mountain Man, posted: "Thanks. Ain't going to happen as I hate having to "work" at trying to figure out what the poster means. [That poster does not give a cent that you don't care to EDUCATE YOURSELF. He ran out of silver spoons decades ago.] If I had adequate download available and not Hughes Net, I might. Even if the poster had taken the time to post a link, I wouldn't have clicked on it. But maybe that's just me." [It is and that's perfectly OK as we are all individuals

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Just post a link Socrates. It's common courtesy, not a violation of copyright.

 

also if I enlarge the TV images I can see a lot of hairlines on the 37s, some on the d, but few on the p.

 

I can appreciate their rarity and uniqueness. But these are some UGLY coins.

 

I'm feeling negative today, so won't respond directly, but if you know anyone in law enforcement, please asked them what this symbol means . . .

 

Regarding the dadadadada "secret" symbol posted in this thread:

The off duty State Trooper guarding our office laughed and told me that it is something some dangerous (in their own mind) person with a low IQ and tiny parts might post and they better not show up around here.

NOW, what do you see on these coins that would affect their grade?



Send me a PM and you'll feel better!

 

Venturing a total guess, but they look cleaned, like toning was removed at some point. On top of that they are pitted, which IMO detracts from what they could be, even though the pitting was part of the process for them to have a matte finish, it still isn't what a "70"should be. A 70 would have the matte finish without the pitting, etc. I also think I see a ding on the bridge of Boone's nose on the Philadelphia (#516).

I also think the comment about altered surfaces applies.

But I also think a 63 is harsh.

 

Mountain Man, post: 4703377, member: 94733"]I'm feeling negative today, so won't respond directly, but if you know anyone in law enforcement, please asked them what this symbol means . . . View attachment 1154919 "

I'm feeling wonderful today. If you know any Railroad men ask them what this symbol means:

 

HINT: What are the black spots?

 

IMO, the black spots look like debris caught up in the pitting, but something else maybe? Carbon?

 

I still can't see anything other than light lines on all three, and toning spots on the S and D. Might seem harsh but wouldn't this normally relegate a PR coin to 63 or 64

 

You can really zoom in to the Philly on Heritage. It's currently up for grabs at $70,000 (+ buyer's premium) Let me know if the link doesn't work.

 

Beefer518, posted: "IMO, the black spots look like debris caught up in the pitting, but something else maybe? Carbon?

Were these coins stored correctly?

 

from the auction description:"This incredibly rare Boone half dollar proof is razor-sharp and fully struck with fine matte surfaces that showcase the design elements to their full extent, while giving the surfaces a soft steel-gray hue common to matte proof silver coins. A few light lines explain the seemingly limited technical grade. Nonetheless, eye appeal is exceptional, and the coin has an almost medallic appearance. The chance to acquire one of three known matte proof Boone Bicentennial half dollars is a landmark event for the classic commemorative specialist. Make sure to bid accordingly."

 

It was probably copyrighted material.

 

I'd liken it to the Americas First Medals series which were struck in pewter back during the bicentennial........

 

I am confused by this thread, I won't lie. Are you aware of why these coins were graded lower than they seem or is this just a general discussion on what everybody thinks?

The black spots look like little pieces of sulfur from improper storage.

 

I've seen those medals but never knew what they were! Thanks for teaching me a little something!

 

Is it embedded sandblasting media? I thought I remember reading somewhere that the mint sandblasted some of the early 1900s proof coins (the coins, not the dies) to achieve the matte appearance. From personal experience, the coins do look reminiscent of sandblasted metal.