Morgan 1889-CC authenticity and grade?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by larssten, Jul 19, 2020.

  1. larssten

    larssten Well-Known Member

    Hi!

    Would anyone be able to give a second opinion on this rare 89-CC Morgan in the raw?

    If authentic, I’m in the VF-ballpark...

    Have only seen the photos and it’s not mine.

    Thanks!
     

    Attached Files:

    capthank likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Penna_Boy

    Penna_Boy Just a nobody from the past

    If it were offered to me I'd pass. Nothing personal - just don't like it's looks. Plus, an 1889 CC not in a TPG slab = why?
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  4. Inspector43

    Inspector43 More than 75 Years Active Collecting Supporter

    My 89 CC VAM 5A is not in a slab. But, it isn't for sale either. 89 CC VAM 5A Obv.jpg 89 CC VAM 5 A Rev.jpg
     
  5. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Here are the three reverses for 1889 CC. Yours kinda looks like #3. The coin looks genuine. I can’t say for sure about the mintmark

    4413FA90-2E0E-403F-BF94-09960F190107.jpeg
     
    Dynoking and larssten like this.
  6. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Because it may never have been sent in. Every 1804 dollar was at one point raw
     
    john65999, Dynoking and larssten like this.
  7. larssten

    larssten Well-Known Member

    I must agree.

    Also - look at the S in PLURIBUS compared to grades one. Am I just paranoid or is the thickness on the one in question off?
     
  8. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    yes
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  9. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    I think the coin is real, but it looks a bit cleaned up to me. I wouldn't be a buyer at VF money if I were you, especially since there are plenty of coins out there to consider.
     
  10. larssten

    larssten Well-Known Member

    Guess I’m just looking at die varieties then
     
  11. larssten

    larssten Well-Known Member

    How much would the potential cleaning take you down from regular VF20 money?
     
  12. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    It might get a softball market grade. But if it weren’t a key date/mark, it wouldn’t grade. Whoever cleaned it, botched it up something bad, poor thing.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  13. larssten

    larssten Well-Known Member

    I would go for #3 as well. It looks like the two C’s are leaning a bit backwards. #2 more vertically oriented and #1 a more bold font
     
    capthank and Inspector43 like this.
  14. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    For a coin like that, I'd be in the Fine ballpark instead.
     
  15. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I would automatically pass on any 1889cc that was uncertified, and not purchased from an extremely reliable source. There are loads of counterfeits that would fool most collectors.
     
  16. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    A little paranoia when it comes to raw, expensive coins is not a bad thing, imo. I don't know Morgans too well, but the lower hair curls on the neck area look granular and "pebbly" to me. I also don't like the look of the 2nd 8 in the date, but again I don't know the series. But I will say that I don't think a competent transfer die forgery can be ruled out from the images. I would stick to a certified example.
     
  17. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    The letters look at little "fat" to me. The overall look says genuine, but the details leave me wondering.

    Whatever it is, it has been cleaned, lightly smoothed and artificially retoned. Therefore, even if the TPG says genuine, it won't get a grade.
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  18. Jim Dale

    Jim Dale Well-Known Member

    My father left my brother and me some Morgans. I got out 20 Raw coins and 5 graded coins. I got an 1880 S, MS 64, 1881 s, NGC MS 63, and a "Wild West Set" with 1882 CC, 1883 CC, and 1884 CC.. all NGC MS 65. I like them all, even the Raw coins I got. He must have been watching TV shopping because I got 10 1921 BU coins.
     
    Inspector43 likes this.
  19. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    Looks like an authentic VAM 5. What's the bit on the obverse close-up picture in the field between the 3rd and 5th right stars? It isn't on the other obverse picture, so I hope it's just a chip of plastic and not a gouge on the coin.
     
    john65999 likes this.
  20. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    I looks so real but I too question light cleaning, the letters, and mint mark. I really hope I am wrong I like it a lot. Best of luck.
     
    Inspector43 likes this.
  21. Mike Thorne

    Mike Thorne Well-Known Member

    Harshly cleaned, in my opinion. Totally wrong look. I've got a F15 with CAC that has the perfect look for a well-circulated 89-CC. As for the grade, I would say VF20.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page