@Lehigh96. Just curious. Did you intend to post the 64 nickel here? I'm asking because the last coin posted for this guessing game was the Proof 62 Liberty Seated Half Dime and the last few coins were not nickels. I vote bean for the Half Dime.
I tried to see if the coin had wear or any hairlines due to cleaning. None that I could see. There are a few hits and if there were more evidence of a dip then maybe not....but I'll go Green bean anyway. jom
Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65 Gold CAC 50c--> Yes: 10 (8 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 4: 1838 AU 58 Green CAC (Gold $5)--> Yes: 1 vs No: 5 Rd. 5: 1908 MS 63 Green CAC (Gold $20)—> Yes: 5 vs No: 1 Rd. 6: 1885-CC MS 63 PL Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1 Rd. 7: 1946-S MS 66 Green CAC Walker 50c--> Yes: 7 (6 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1 Rd. 8: 1885-S MS 62 NOT CAC Morgan--> Yes: 5 (4 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1 Rd. 9: 1830 EF 45 UNKNOWN CAC 50c--> Yes: 10 vs No: 1 Rd. 10*: 1899 MS 65 BN UNKNOWN CAC 1c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 5 Rd. 11: 1942 MS 65 Gold CAC 50c--> Yes: 4 (4 Green and 0 Gold) vs No: 2 Rd. 12: 1940-D MS 67 Star UNKNOWN CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4 Rd. 13*: 1884-O MS 61 Gold CAC $1--> Yes: 9 (4 Green and 5 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 14: 1827 AU 55 CAC 10c--> Yes: 1 vs No: 7 Rd. 15: 1851 MS 66 CAC 1c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 4 Rd. 16: 1919-S MS 65 Green CAC 10c--> Yes: 12 (11 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 17: 1922 MS 65 NOT CAC Peace $1--> Yes: 10 vs No: 1 Rd. 18: 1851 Au 58+ CAC 1/2C--> Yes: 0 vs No: 6 Rd. 19: 1839-O AU 53 NO CAC 50c--> Yes: 6 (5 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 3 Rd. 20: 1920 MS 65 NO CAC 25c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 6 Rd. 21: 1862 PF 64 CAC H10c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 1 Rd. 22: 1869 PF 63 Gold CAC 10c--> Yes: 7 (5 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 23: 1834 XF 45 CAC $5--> Yes: 2 vs No: 5 Rd. 24: 1835 XF 40 CAC 25c--> Yes: 8 (7 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 2 Rd. 25: 1876 MS 62 Not CAC 50c--> Yes: 7 (6 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1 Rd. 26: 1853 MS 64 Not CAC 10c--> Yes: 7 vs No: 0 Rd. 27: 1913 MS 62 CAC 2.5 Gold--> Yes: 1 vs No: 5 Rd. 28: 1835 AU 58 CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 7 Rd. 29: 1908-S MS 64 CAC 1c--> Yes: 9 vs No: 2 Rd. 30: 1913-D MS 66+ CAC 5c--> Yes: 10 vs No: 0 Rd. 31: 1829 AU 55 NOT CAC 5c--> Yes: 11 vs No: 1 Rd. 32: 1851 MS 61 CAC 2.5 Gold--> Yes: 4 (3 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 2 Rd. 33: 1936-D MS 66 GOLD CAC 5c--> Yes: 3 (3 Green) vs No: 2 Rd. 34: 1941-S AU 55 NOT CAC 10c--> Yes: 11 (2 Green and 9 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 35: 1924 MS 66 CAC 25c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4 Rd. 36: 1936-D MS 67 Texas UNKNOWN CAC 50c--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1 Rd. 37: 1928 MS 66 Oregon UNKNOWN CAC 50c--> Yes: 9 vs No: 0 Rd. 38: 1893 MS 64 Isabella CAC 25c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 9 Rd. 39: 1820 AU 58 CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 7 Rd. 40: 1881-S MS 65 CAC $1--> Yes: 7 (3 Green and 4 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 41: 1940 PR 66 CAC 50c--> Yes: 7 vs No: 0 Rd. 42: 1824 AU 50 CAC 50c--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1 Rd. 43: 1937 Texas MS 66 CAC 50c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 2 Rd. 44: 1903 PR 63 NOT CAC 50c--> Yes: 9 vs No: 1 Rd. 45: 1857 MS 64 CAC 10c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 6 Rd. 46: 1828 MS 62 CAC 10c--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1 Rd. 47: 1958 MS 67 FBL CAC 50c--> Yes: 1 vs No: 9 Rd. 48: 1902 PR 64 NOT CAC 50c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4 Rd. 49: 1832 AU 58 CAC 1/2c--> Yes: 5 (1 gold) vs No: 4 Rd. 50: 1902 PF 61 CAC 25c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 2 Rd. 51: 1953-D MS 66+ FBL CAC 50c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4 Rd. 52: 1880 MS 64 CAC $1--> Yes: 3 vs No: 2 Rd. 53: 1882-CC MS 62 CAC $1--> Yes: 5 vs No: 1 Rd. 54: 1892 MS 64 Columbian CAC 50c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 0 Rd. 55: 1895-O VF 20 CAC $1--> Yes: 1 vs No: 6 Rd. 56: 1880-O MS 64 Not CAC $1--> Yes: 11 vs No: 0 Rd. 57: 1954 PF 65 CAM Gold CAC 50c--> Yes: 7 (7 Green and 0 Gold) vs No: 1 Rd. 58: 1879-S MS 65 CAC $1--> Yes: 5 vs No: 2 Rd. 59: 1949 MS 66+ FBL CAC 50c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 5 Rd. 60: 1880-S MS 66 PL Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 5 vs No: 7 Rd. 61: 1936 MS 67+ Green CAC York 50c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 5 Rd. 62: 1823/2 AU 58 CAC 10c--> Yes: 6 vs No: 3 Rd. 63: 1920 MS 65 CAC Pilgrim 50c--> Yes: 7 vs No: 4 Rd. 64: 1901/0-S XF 45 GOLD CAC Gold $5--> Yes: 7 (5 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 2 Rd. 65: 1937-D Texas MS 66 CAC 50c--> Yes: 12 vs No: 1 Rd. 66: 1829 AU 55 CAC 50c--> Yes: 8 vs No: 2 Rd. 67: 1859 PR 62 Gold CAC H10c--> Yes: 7 (6 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1 Green CAC on coin and deserves it: 26 Green CAC on coin and doesn't deserve it: 17 Gold CAC on coin and deserves it: 1 Gold CAC on coin but should only be Green: 7 Gold CAC on coin but should not sticker: Failed to sticker but deserves a sticker: 9 Failed to sticker and should not sticker: 2 Unknown sticker status and deserves a sticker:3 Unknown sticker status and does not deserve a sticker:2 Note: if we don’t know the status of a coin before the reveal and more people say green CAC for a gold CAC coin, then it will go in the area of “Gold CAC on coin but should only be Green” ....see round 3 as the example case * Rd. 10 was 4-4...I interpreted that CircCam would consider it a no (based on a similar example), which swayed the overall vote to a lean towards no. Rd. 13 was tied between green and gold at 4-4...I interpreted that geekpryde would consider it a gold
I like the coin but it looks like the surface was "wiped" at some time; at least that's what it looks like to me in the last photos.
But it could be an artifact of photographic lighting. Besides, if it was an obvious wipe I would doubt both PCGS and CAC would fail to notice. Just a thought.... jom
Why would this coin need a CAC sticker? I'm gonna say no sticker because much of the toning is near terminal state. No Beans
You'd be surprised by what needs a sticker to some. I had a common Lincoln commemorative Half Dollar in MS 63 and had multiple people ask me about CAC status. I'm seeing it more often with coins where the sticker shouldn't really matter.