Are these cud errors ? And what are the value ?

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

No. those are not cuds. The time looks like a possible rim-to-rim die crack though.
Here are some examples of cuds:

 

Looks like 2, almost parallel, rim to rim die cracks

 

I think they both have glue on them. The lines on the dime do not show on the edge. Can you post photos of reverse?

 

Glue?... the reverse side there is nothing wrong

 

If that is not glue. Which it does have the possibility. It is a retained cud.
The crack crosses the rim at each end. 3 and 7 o clock

 

They look like rim to rim die cracks to me. It's possible that it could be glue so I wouldn't rule that out. Not a cud. This is a Cud:


Welcome to CT.

 

The dime looks like a die crack running from the rim near 6 o'clock north through IGWT. The anomaly running from the rim at about 2 o'clock through Roosevelt's head and then south toward the die crack looks like PMD. It's my guess that someone was trying to make this a more spectacular error than it actually was so they could sell it for more money. ~ Chris

 

The Rosie is a die crack but can you post a closer pic of the 89 cent??

 

Seems 2007 was a good year for these dimes
https://www.cointalk.com/threads/2007-roosevelt-dime-shattered-obverse-die-strike.337031/

 

Yours looks to be SHD-10c-2007P-01

 

I pulled this 2006 P roll searching

 

You wouldn’t believe it the one cent did have glue on it but the dime is for sure a crack I found one online that’s identical

 

Way to go girl! Congrats on the dime being a rim to rim die crack. It's a keeper.

 

A cud MUST be a die break connected to the rim of the coin. So the "blob" will have to be at the edge to be called a cud. Its just the way the terminology works. Die break on the rim=CUD. Die break anywhere else=die break....lol....happy huntin