Heritage coin pics vs. in-hand

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by C-B-D, Jun 29, 2020.

  1. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    First set was Heritage. Second set is mine, and what the coin looks like in-hand. I've noticed a sickly, overlit + color balance error lately on many Heritage listings. I am MUCH happier with this coin than I expected, now that I've seen it in-hand!
    20200605_202850-side.jpg draped1.JPG
     
    jtlee321, ldhair, Penna_Boy and 5 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Wow, what a difference! Coin looks great!
     
    jtlee321 and C-B-D like this.
  4. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Sweet! Matches your set perfectly!
     
    C-B-D likes this.
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    The coin looks different until you look close. What a difference.
     
    C-B-D likes this.
  6. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    In a way, I'm glad they photograph they way they do. I think people hold back when a photo isn't good. In my case, it wasn't as drastic as yours, but the in-hand coin is sooooo much nicer then their photos. My HA coin, their pic on left, mine on right:

    ha-and-me.jpg
     
  7. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    So far. They don't all match perfectly, but they make me happy. Still looking for the right half dollar that isn't overpriced.
    draped1.JPG IMG_4004-side.JPG draped3.JPG IMG_3107-side.JPG
     
    CircCam, Santinidollar and Penna_Boy like this.
  8. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    jtlee321 likes this.
  9. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    In fairness, 15 years ago, their photos were really bad. They have gotten much better over the years, but I think their stock setup for their slab shots uses extreme diffused lighting. The result is over lit surfaces that are very easy to evaluate but subdued luster across the board. The “beauty shots” for toned coins and high value items I think are contracted out. I know Todd Pollack was doing them for a while, and recently they have been using PCGS TruViews.
     
    johnmilton, Morgandude11 and C-B-D like this.
  10. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    The overlit Heritage picture looks like one of their glam shots. I'm much more comfortable viewing their generic, assembly line slab shots, and thus find them to be much more useful.
     
    C-B-D and Morgandude11 like this.
  11. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Those are some truly ugly "Glamour" shots. They really need to let go whomever is photographing those, they aren't doing anyone a service. It looks like some Millennial with an iPhone shot them and then pumped up the contrast and pushed the midtones and highlights to an extreme.
     
    C-B-D likes this.
  12. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Like messydesk said the photography is assembly line. You are taking thousands of pictures. You can't take the time to adjust the lighting, positioning, and take a dozen shots to pick the best one. You have your camera set in position, the lighting fixed in place to give you a good "average" shot. Then you start taking pictures. Obv, rev, next coin, obv, rev, next coin etc. We all know to get the best representative pictures that look the most like the coin does in hand you have to work at it changing and tweaking things. Except on very rare items Heritage doesn't have that luxury. So when you get the coin and you DO take the time to get the shot right, it is little wonder the in hand images are better than Heritage.
     
    jtlee321, Beefer518 and C-B-D like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page