GTG: 1875 Seated Half

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Jun 29, 2020.

?

Grade and comments

  1. XF 45

    1 vote(s)
    4.0%
  2. AU 50

    1 vote(s)
    4.0%
  3. AU 53

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. AU 55

    7 vote(s)
    28.0%
  5. AU 58

    7 vote(s)
    28.0%
  6. MS 60

    1 vote(s)
    4.0%
  7. MS 61

    2 vote(s)
    8.0%
  8. MS62

    4 vote(s)
    16.0%
  9. MS63

    4 vote(s)
    16.0%
  10. MS64

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Ok, have fun!
    CADF3896-5BE4-46B3-BDA1-7B31AFD62F9D.jpeg 0C455737-6A58-42E3-AC87-9112278B9A7B.jpeg
     
    SchwaVB57 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ddddd

    ddddd Member

  4. Dima

    Dima Member

    Tough to tell through plastic, but I'm pretty sure it's graded *drool* :p lovely half!

    I'm thinking AU58.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I said MS-62.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  6. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    IMHO, my eyes say MS-62. Beautiful coin.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  7. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    I'm thinking there is enough rub to go AU58.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  8. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    58 also
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  9. SorenCoins

    SorenCoins Well-Known Member

  10. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

  11. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    58. 62 would not floor me.
     
    SorenCoins and Morgandude11 like this.
  12. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I think it's a choice 58. Slab grade could be 63, though
     
    SorenCoins and Morgandude11 like this.
  13. LRC-Tom

    LRC-Tom Been around the block...

    I say AU-58. The wide-open areas of the field show more subdued luster than the protected areas, such as around the stars. This is a sign of a few fingers and thumbs handling the coin before it was put away for posterity.
     
    SorenCoins and Morgandude11 like this.
  14. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    I am at 55, but yes, it’s likely the label says MS62/63. It shouldn’t though.
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2020
    SorenCoins and Morgandude11 like this.
  15. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Way too much luster gone on the high points and open fields to be a slider.
    AU55.
     
  16. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Bought this one at a coin show two years ago. The seller was asking $150, so I could not get my credit card out fast enough. It is way undergraded. I agree with AU 58, as there is plenty of luster in hand. On any given day, I bet it could grade 62 or 63, as it verges on uncirculated, and is awfully close. Yes, it is a slider.

    C0A7B21A-D1B7-44F2-96DE-DDC2D00F0963.jpeg
     
    SorenCoins, Dima, ddddd and 2 others like this.
  17. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    AU53 before peeking.
     
    SorenCoins likes this.
  18. buckeye73

    buckeye73 Well-Known Member

    I’d pay AU 50 money any day for that coin based on the photos. In hand may be different. BtW, I received this CT at 9:50 am today and first viewed this thread after the reveal.
     
    SorenCoins and Morgandude11 like this.
  19. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    Late on this one. I would have guessed between 55 and 58. AU50 seems like a total knock down. This one would be interesting to send off to CAC. Would it get two gold stickers? :woot:
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  20. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Or there is something we are not seeing in the photos. That much luster loss should no way ever be a slider.
     
  21. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    For the record I never said it was a slider. I do not think it is in any regard. If it would have been labeled as MS it would definitely be market graded as it’s a technical AU. The coin did circulate and it shows on the high points. My mention of the CAC gold stickers was a joke because the consensus was that this coin is a 58 and a well respected collector said a choice 58. My comment on having two CAC stickers was meaning if this coin is a solid 58 than the coin is 3.5 grades too low. I think this coin would get a gold sticker even at 55 unless of course as mentioned there is something we are not seeing in the pictures that netted it down to 50 but I and others don’t see it.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page