GTG 1887 Morgan

Okay, you know the drill.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

MS 65 PL
...it's hard to make out the fields and cheek, but I think it's clean enough for gem status....and the PL stands out on the obverse (I'm guessing the reverse is similar)

 

I said 64 PL, but a 65 would not surprise me. Nice coin.

 

I agree with @ddddd. Looks like the coin is pristine with very minimal contact marks and definitely proof like, or better.

I'm thinking MS65+ PL.

(Could easily be DMPL, but I have a really hard time telling SPL/PL/DMPL from photos...)

 

Obverse, MS-65. Reverse, MS-64 (DD or weak strike)

 

I'm at a MS-64.

 

+1

 

I am going to say MS64+ DMPL. Mostly because of what looks like a little PVC on the reverse beside the berries right of T in UNITED.

 

65PL. But not really a fan of the eye appeal on this one.

 

Very hard to get a picture of this coin. In hand, it explodes.

 

64 DMPL

 

64PL

 

Those who said 65 are probably right. Tons of die polish lines in the fields, but very few bagmarks, and lots of frost, which the photos did not capture. For those who did not get DMPL, it is almost impossible to differentiate between PL and DMPL from a photograph.

 

Ah yes. The blind hog finds an acorn.